What you see is not what you get ....

​Each day on this Blog we have been analysing a story that is still being 'passed-off' as broadcasting 'history'.

We continue to look into the authenticity of claims made in support of statements by a vast congregation of collective interests who have been, and who still are, telling the public that what they see (and read and hear) from various sources is the truth, the 'real story', when in fact it is not the 'true story' or the 'real story' because the version currently in circulation is a fake. It is a make-believe ramble of nothingness in order to support a variety of hidden interests who dare not let the actual story be known.

This is a story about the foundation of individual liberty and personal freedom from birth to death.

There is no "we" in the birth to death process other than the two human beings, one male and one female, who caused another human being to come into existence. Here we are discussing the biological aspects of reality. We are not discussing the existence or non-existence of an ethereal component added to that human birth that some claim and some deny, sets human beings apart from other biological life forms on this Planet.

The problem with lies and liars is that they depend upon the "we" factor to have any effect. The more numbers that can be added to believers and promoters of a lie, the more 'weight', the more credibility in the minds of the "we" population that it gains. The lie becomes an "everyone knows" factor, which really means that many believe, not that "everyone knows".

As part of a group of three individuals, "we" are peering behind the 'Oz-like' curtain to see if what can be discovered is documentation, or as in the movie, just a human being who is nervously trying to prevent anyone from peering behind the curtain. The reason for this act of prevention is because what will be discovered is a void that exists between what is stated as fact, is in reality, a myth.

The Crown of the United Kingdom is one of the greatest 'Oz-like' myths in existence, and all that it creates now, or has created in the past is based upon that same foundation of mythology. In the past our academic series - which is preserved on line at http://foundthreads.com - has dealt in depth with the makings of this mythology. Here we are focused upon one aspect of that mythology which is covered by broadcasting.

On July 13, 1960, the British Crown authorized the creation of a body of people called the 'Pilkington Committee' to examine the subject of broadcasting in the British Isles.

As we have begun to reveal in this Blog, the story of broadcasting, and not just the technical aspects of electrical broadcasting, began back at the dawn of the Twentieth Century. It soon erupted into a pitched battle between individuals advocating mass distribution of the printed word, and individuals advocating the scattering of signals containing messages that could be received by anyone with the means to do so.

This 'war' of methodology centered upon timing.

To instantly scatter a message bought about instant death to those who belatedly wanted to scatter that same message in print. One was newsworthy and the other was worthy of decorating the liner of a temporary floor covering.

Prior to the intrusion of broadcasting there had been no doubt that news came from reading newspapers printed on expensive presses. So the bottom line of this story reveals that it is all about money: Those who have it, and those who seek by competitive means to take money away from those who have it.

That is the world of laissez faire.

But this French phrase, which when translated into English means "allow to do", poses the question of it is that is allowing something to be done, or not done? This is where the mythical "we" resurfaces under the banner of religious and political organizations. No longer is the issue a straight-forward commercial question about who can and who cannot make money to create with profit, but one in which, for non-commercial reasons, the "we factor" decides that "they" will not allow an 'uncontrolled' profit to be made.

In the instance of mass communications in the UK, it becomes a murky issue indeed. In the USA, which is the home of modern capitalism, the 1791 First Amendment to its federal Constitution, forbids the federal U.S. government from daring to to tread where the British Crown has always walked with impunity and trampled individuality under its feet. That process is revealed in the way that the British Broadcasting Corporation came into existence.

The British Broadcasting Corporation was born in January 1927, although it pretends to the world that it came to life on October 18, 1922. According to BBC propaganda in 2022, this means that the current BBC is now 100 years old. In fact, it is only 95 years old because the current BBC is not the original BBC.

This raises the question of "does it matter"?

The answer is yes, it does matter because it is the difference between reality and fable, or in the terminology of the law, passing off a lie as the the truth. But since the law in the United Kingdom all falls under the skirt of the Queen as its sovereign who represents the Crown corporation sole. It cannot be a lie since the law only exists if the Crown says that it exists, and that is because all law has to be signed-off by the Queen. It is a classic example of one law for "them" and another law for "us".

But who is this "us", is it not the same as "we"?

Not at all, because the United Kingdom is ruled by an Establishment, and they are the "we", while the "them" are the hoi polloi subjects who were once pretended to be European "citizens". But now, post-Brexit "them" are now back to being an unclassified herd of people reacquiring the politically incorrect title of "Subjects of the Crown".

It is a mess that no one wants to discuss.

No one wants to call anything for what it is and where according to some, "pregnant women" are now "birthing persons" (or something similar.)

Consequently when it comes to the subject of 'Radio Caroline', it easy, very easy for a small group of primarily aging men to claim that 'Radio Caroline' is now 'born again', yet not 'born again', because it never died on August 14, 1967. It is a silly game of language obfuscation mixed with a New Age kind of religious cultism.

Therefore trying to untangle this mess in a precise manner is very difficult, yet not impossible, and that is exactly and precisely what our small group of individuals is now trying to do by reexamining how the British Crown has again and again created the mythology of independent broadcasting in the United Kingdom. The myth is a lie and the foundation of those lies is now being documented right here, right now.