Terms and Conditions
FOR READERS OF THIS PART-WORK EDITION
Except where supporting references are used, this work is copyright 2023 by the authors.
This is not the final version of this work, therefore permission is not granted for downloading.
About this Work
Latest update January 5, 2024 at 4:00 PM UTC
FOR READERS OF THIS PART-WORK EDITION
Except where supporting references are used, this work is copyright 2023 by the authors.
This is not the final version of this work, therefore permission is not granted for downloading.
About this Work
Latest update January 5, 2024 at 4:00 PM UTC
As the crow flies, its just over six miles across the water from Crinan in the Scottish Highlands, to Barnhill on the island of Jura, but after reading a holiday maker's report, I don't think that I would want to spend a vacation in its lonely farmhouse. But Eric Blair did in the lead-up 1947 and one of the worst winter storms to ever sweep across the British Isles.
In July 2016, a family decided to spend their holiday in that cottage which is only accessible after a four mile hike, because there are no roads fit for regular vehicle traffic. But what they reported was that the building was cold, damp and dirty. Modern amenities that were fully functional and fit for purpose was an unfulfilled dream.
Now imagine Eric Blair with tuberculosis sitting in that same farmhouse due to the felicitation of his friend David Astor in London. Some say that he was there because he had written a book called 'Animal Farm' under the pen name of George Orwell, and he feared that the Soviet dictator Joe Stalin might send hit men to kill him, just as he is alleged to have assassinated Leon Trotsky in Mexico City. So Eric, or George as most people call him, is also alleged to have kept a gun handy in case he should need to defend himself against an attack by an intruder,
His saving grace was that he was now blasting Britain, and not Russia with his latest work in progress that his publisher renamed 'Nineteen-Eighty-Four'. Orwell lived through the hyped-up delivery of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's 'Four Freedoms' address to the U.S. Congress as part of his State of the Union speech on - 1939. America was still at peace with Japan and the rest of the world.
Then came WWII, and in the United Kingdom, Orwell went to work for the British Broadcasting Corporation and observed how up was being portrayed as down, and left portrayed as right under Winston Churchill tenure as Prime Minister. Churchill was a contradiction in terminology. As the Member of Parliament for Dundee in 1920, Winnie lambasted 'bad Jews' (as he called them), for being part of a secret society called the 'Illuminati' which had overthrown the Russian monarchy and opened the door a dictatorship.
But that was not the only thing that Churchill did, because almost as soon as he became Prime Minister he decided to fight 'dirty', in other words he became what we would class today as a terrorist leader by creating an array of secret operations and directed some of them to "set Europe ablaze", not by conventional warfare, but by stealth behind enemy lines. Churchill also employed Sefton Delmer to set-up a clandestine broadcasting system outside of anything controlled by the British Broadcasting Corporation. Delmer's stations were true 'pirates of the airwaves' pretending to be Catholic religious programs in German serving the needs of the Wehrmacht, and secular programs targeting the Kriegsmarine sailors who manned the u-boats. Selmer's operations were extensive, and part of an overall plan of action that included the code-breaking operations taking place at nearby Bletchley. They even included a pornographic side that Sir Stafford Cripps thought was so disgusting that he is alleged to have said that he would rather lose the War than to have any part of these publications.
While sitting in his bleak farmhouse Orwell's imagination ran wild but he instead of trying to write his next book as a record of his own personal experience, he invented a character called Winston Smith who worked in London in the future year 1965, as part of a government team working on the creation of a 'Woke' dictionary that was set for final release in the year 2050. Orwell's novel as not writing about the year 1984, but events that climaxed that year in his betrayal as a non-believer and therefore and enemy of the State whose leader was known as 'Big Brother'.
The interesting thing about 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' is that it is based upon the idea of flipping FDR's 'Four Freedoms' upside down to become the exact opposite of what they appeared to be. He also invented a contracted form of the English language which today sounds very much like 'Cancel Culture' and 'Woke' terminology in which past meanings disappear in order to invent a past that never was, and he did all of that in the farmhouse at Barnhill on Jura. Health-wise it was a personal disaster and writing 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' finished him off, due to his tuberculosis.
Today, the average person seems to think that Orwell's novel is about the past and that it refers to Russia under Stalin. Instead it is a book about Britain and the future. But trying to get the average person to see that the true reflection of the United Kingdom is not a harmless monarchy preserved for tourist purposes, but a ruthless regime that lies, cheats, steals and promotes terrorism, while pretending that it does not of those things.
The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is actually a British product having emerged from a prior WWII operation that used the initials OSS, and it was a spin-off from Churchill's numerous WWII umbrella of clandestine activities that led to the creation of the SAS under the direction of David Stirling. But looking deeper into life as it is now lived in the Twenty-first Century, and then explaining that apparently harmless institutions such as the Post Office is in fact an Orwellian upside-down operation that persecutes British people, well, that is going too far.
Or is it?
This time it took a script writer and not a book author to create a four-part drama to tell the tale. The January 2024 showing on the UK ITV network of 'Mr Bates versus Post Office', has been described as"the extraordinary story of the greatest miscarriage of justice in British legal history, where hundreds of innocent sub-postmasters and postmistresses were wrongly accused of theft, fraud and false accounting due to a defective IT system."
The minds of the British public-at-large have been drawn to see thuggish nature of the British Crown, because the Post Office is its creation, and the Crown is represented by a monarch who can do no wrong, because the King is the law. So when something evil is exposed, the Crown sacrifices its minions who are civil servants and government agents carrying out the wishes of the Crown. This is nothing new and it dates back to the reign of Henry VIII, and then 'perfected' by the son of King Charles I, after his father was executed.
Now there is a King Charles III sitting on the throne and this current Post Office scandal began under the reign of his mother called Elizabeth II.
The Crown through its entity called the Post Office harms hundred of people, and therefore the question is, where do these victims go to seek redress from a King who can do no wrong? They turn to members of the Law Society which was created in 1845 by a Royal Charter issued in the name of Queen Victoria who ruled over much of the world in the name of the British Empire. The Law Society is the governing body that regulates the British legal profession. Its original Royal Charter begins with these words:
"VICTORIA, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Queen, Defender of the Faith, To all to whom these presents shall come, greeting."
The rest of the legal system which includes Barristers, is now vested in the 'Legal Services Act 2007' which created following this introduction to the legislation:
"Be it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same ...."
In other words the entire legal system is based upon the Crown, which is a corporation sole, an entity like the Papacy that never ends. One Pope dies and another takes his place. A King or a Queen dies and another one takes their place.
So when we come down to day-to-day operations such as the Post Office, the question is, who is ultimately responsible if it harms the people it is supposed to represent? There is no Constitution written by The People that it is supposed to represent, because in reality, there are no citizens, there are only subjects, even if Woke wording is employed to substitute the word 'subject' for the word 'citizen'. In practical terms in 2024 there are only subjects of the Crown residing in the British Isles, with the exception of the Republic of Ireland.
The story which has no erupted onto the television screens as Mr Bates versus Post Office', i
A candy-colored clown they call the sandman
Tiptoes to my room every night
Just to sprinkle stardust and to whisper
Go to sleep, everything is alright
I close my eyes then I drift away
Into the magic night, I softly say
A silent prayer like dreamers do
Then I fall asleep to dream my dreams of you
In dreams I walk with you
In dreams I talk to you
In dreams you're mine all of the time
We're together in dreams, in dreams
But just before the dawn
I awake and find you gone
I can't help it
I can't help it
If I cry
I remember that you said goodbye
It's too bad that all these things
Can only happen in my dreams
Only in dreams
In beautiful dreams
But now, thanks to the British ITV broadcast of 'Mr Bates versus Post Office' , which is described as"the extraordinary story of the greatest miscarriage of justice in British legal history, where hundreds of innocent sub-postmasters and postmistresses were wrongly accused of theft, fraud and false accounting due to a defective IT system", the mind of the public-at-large has been drawn to the thuggish nature of the British Crown. Its Post Office functioned under a system wherein the King is the law and can do no wrong, and that same system then shielded itself by sacrificing its minions who were the civil servants and government agents carrying out the wishes of the Crown. This is nothing new and it dates back to the reign of Henry VIII, but which was 'perfected' by King Charles II.
In July 2016, a family decided to spend their holiday in that cottage which is only accessible after a four mile hike, because there are no roads fit for regular vehicle traffic. But what they reported was that the building was cold, damp and dirty. Modern amenities that were fully functional and fit for purpose was an unfulfilled dream.
Now imagine Eric Blair with tuberculosis sitting in that same farmhouse due to the felicitation of his friend David Astor in London. Some say that he was there because he had written a book called 'Animal Farm' under the pen name of George Orwell, and he feared that the Soviet dictator Joe Stalin might send hit men to kill him, just as he is alleged to have assassinated Leon Trotsky in Mexico City. So Eric, or George as most people call him, is also alleged to have kept a gun handy in case he should need to defend himself against an attack by an intruder,
His saving grace was that he was now blasting Britain, and not Russia with his latest work in progress that his publisher renamed 'Nineteen-Eighty-Four'. Orwell lived through the hyped-up delivery of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's 'Four Freedoms' address to the U.S. Congress as part of his State of the Union speech on - 1939. America was still at peace with Japan and the rest of the world.
Then came WWII, and in the United Kingdom, Orwell went to work for the British Broadcasting Corporation and observed how up was being portrayed as down, and left portrayed as right under Winston Churchill tenure as Prime Minister. Churchill was a contradiction in terminology. As the Member of Parliament for Dundee in 1920, Winnie lambasted 'bad Jews' (as he called them), for being part of a secret society called the 'Illuminati' which had overthrown the Russian monarchy and opened the door a dictatorship.
But that was not the only thing that Churchill did, because almost as soon as he became Prime Minister he decided to fight 'dirty', in other words he became what we would class today as a terrorist leader by creating an array of secret operations and directed some of them to "set Europe ablaze", not by conventional warfare, but by stealth behind enemy lines. Churchill also employed Sefton Delmer to set-up a clandestine broadcasting system outside of anything controlled by the British Broadcasting Corporation. Delmer's stations were true 'pirates of the airwaves' pretending to be Catholic religious programs in German serving the needs of the Wehrmacht, and secular programs targeting the Kriegsmarine sailors who manned the u-boats. Selmer's operations were extensive, and part of an overall plan of action that included the code-breaking operations taking place at nearby Bletchley. They even included a pornographic side that Sir Stafford Cripps thought was so disgusting that he is alleged to have said that he would rather lose the War than to have any part of these publications.
While sitting in his bleak farmhouse Orwell's imagination ran wild but he instead of trying to write his next book as a record of his own personal experience, he invented a character called Winston Smith who worked in London in the future year 1965, as part of a government team working on the creation of a 'Woke' dictionary that was set for final release in the year 2050. Orwell's novel as not writing about the year 1984, but events that climaxed that year in his betrayal as a non-believer and therefore and enemy of the State whose leader was known as 'Big Brother'.
The interesting thing about 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' is that it is based upon the idea of flipping FDR's 'Four Freedoms' upside down to become the exact opposite of what they appeared to be. He also invented a contracted form of the English language which today sounds very much like 'Cancel Culture' and 'Woke' terminology in which past meanings disappear in order to invent a past that never was, and he did all of that in the farmhouse at Barnhill on Jura. Health-wise it was a personal disaster and writing 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' finished him off, due to his tuberculosis.
Today, the average person seems to think that Orwell's novel is about the past and that it refers to Russia under Stalin. Instead it is a book about Britain and the future. But trying to get the average person to see that the true reflection of the United Kingdom is not a harmless monarchy preserved for tourist purposes, but a ruthless regime that lies, cheats, steals and promotes terrorism, while pretending that it does not of those things.
The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is actually a British product having emerged from a prior WWII operation that used the initials OSS, and it was a spin-off from Churchill's numerous WWII umbrella of clandestine activities that led to the creation of the SAS under the direction of David Stirling. But looking deeper into life as it is now lived in the Twenty-first Century, and then explaining that apparently harmless institutions such as the Post Office is in fact an Orwellian upside-down operation that persecutes British people, well, that is going too far.
Or is it?
This time it took a script writer and not a book author to create a four-part drama to tell the tale. The January 2024 showing on the UK ITV network of 'Mr Bates versus Post Office', has been described as"the extraordinary story of the greatest miscarriage of justice in British legal history, where hundreds of innocent sub-postmasters and postmistresses were wrongly accused of theft, fraud and false accounting due to a defective IT system."
The minds of the British public-at-large have been drawn to see thuggish nature of the British Crown, because the Post Office is its creation, and the Crown is represented by a monarch who can do no wrong, because the King is the law. So when something evil is exposed, the Crown sacrifices its minions who are civil servants and government agents carrying out the wishes of the Crown. This is nothing new and it dates back to the reign of Henry VIII, and then 'perfected' by the son of King Charles I, after his father was executed.
Now there is a King Charles III sitting on the throne and this current Post Office scandal began under the reign of his mother called Elizabeth II.
The Crown through its entity called the Post Office harms hundred of people, and therefore the question is, where do these victims go to seek redress from a King who can do no wrong? They turn to members of the Law Society which was created in 1845 by a Royal Charter issued in the name of Queen Victoria who ruled over much of the world in the name of the British Empire. The Law Society is the governing body that regulates the British legal profession. Its original Royal Charter begins with these words:
"VICTORIA, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Queen, Defender of the Faith, To all to whom these presents shall come, greeting."
The rest of the legal system which includes Barristers, is now vested in the 'Legal Services Act 2007' which created following this introduction to the legislation:
"Be it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same ...."
In other words the entire legal system is based upon the Crown, which is a corporation sole, an entity like the Papacy that never ends. One Pope dies and another takes his place. A King or a Queen dies and another one takes their place.
So when we come down to day-to-day operations such as the Post Office, the question is, who is ultimately responsible if it harms the people it is supposed to represent? There is no Constitution written by The People that it is supposed to represent, because in reality, there are no citizens, there are only subjects, even if Woke wording is employed to substitute the word 'subject' for the word 'citizen'. In practical terms in 2024 there are only subjects of the Crown residing in the British Isles, with the exception of the Republic of Ireland.
The story which has no erupted onto the television screens as Mr Bates versus Post Office', i
A candy-colored clown they call the sandman
Tiptoes to my room every night
Just to sprinkle stardust and to whisper
Go to sleep, everything is alright
I close my eyes then I drift away
Into the magic night, I softly say
A silent prayer like dreamers do
Then I fall asleep to dream my dreams of you
In dreams I walk with you
In dreams I talk to you
In dreams you're mine all of the time
We're together in dreams, in dreams
But just before the dawn
I awake and find you gone
I can't help it
I can't help it
If I cry
I remember that you said goodbye
It's too bad that all these things
Can only happen in my dreams
Only in dreams
In beautiful dreams
But now, thanks to the British ITV broadcast of 'Mr Bates versus Post Office' , which is described as"the extraordinary story of the greatest miscarriage of justice in British legal history, where hundreds of innocent sub-postmasters and postmistresses were wrongly accused of theft, fraud and false accounting due to a defective IT system", the mind of the public-at-large has been drawn to the thuggish nature of the British Crown. Its Post Office functioned under a system wherein the King is the law and can do no wrong, and that same system then shielded itself by sacrificing its minions who were the civil servants and government agents carrying out the wishes of the Crown. This is nothing new and it dates back to the reign of Henry VIII, but which was 'perfected' by King Charles II.
This part-work publication is the creation of three co-authors, Genie Baskir, Eric Gilder and Mervyn Hagger. Its origin is set in the year 1985 when the beginnings of this ad hoc research project was triggered by an initial enquiry. It began with this question:
"Why can't you play rock 'n' roll all day on the UK airwaves, but you can in the USA?"
That question soon mushroomed into many, just like ripples resulting from a single pebble being thrown into a calm body of water. Many parallel lines of investigation then commenced, and now, using the concept of perspective, these seemingly unrelated lines of research have converged into one moment in time beginning in 1635 with the creation of the Post Office. It was an entity created by authority of King Charles I who claimed sovereignty of both the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland.
The original question about rock 'n' roll being played on the airwaves resulted from actions taken by the Post Office. However, the Post Office did not censor the playing of rock 'n' roll, but the broadcasting of unauthorized religious and political points of view that paid for rock 'n' roll to be played on the air.
In late 1964, Don Pierson of Eastland, Texas began to work on a project that challenged the ability of the British Post Office to stifle freedom of the airwaves. His motivation was the guarantee of freedom which he was accustomed to as a citizen of the United States of America.
In 1980, the three co-authors begun their own individual association with Don Pierson, and he suggested that a further attempt should be made to restart 'Radio London' as a syndicated radio program in the USA. This was during the time that a new media phase had begun via the start of MTV to spark a new wave of interest in British popular music. That endeavor was not successful, but it was this project which sparked the initial question about playing of rock 'n' roll on the airwaves.
In 1985, the answer to that question was found in a copy of the 1968 Yearbook of Encyclopedia Britannica. It was located upon a shelf behind the control desk in a radio studio linked to the 'Radio London' syndication venture. That book contained an article of about five pages in length which had been published under the byline of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo L. Black. In it, he linked the origins of the U.S. Constitution of 1789, to a draft document written in1649, called 'An Agreement of the Free People of England'. It was the draft of a written constitution which owed its authorship in part to John Lilburne. Born in 1614, Lilburne became known as Freeborn John' during his lifetime which ended in the year 1657.
Hugo Black inspired the co-authors of this work to begin their own investigation into the family tree of John Lilburne. This led them to discover Lilburne's connections to the family of U.S. President Thomas Jefferson. It was Jefferson's input which in part resulted in the first amendments to the U.S. Constitution which became known as its 'Bill of Rights'. Those amendments prohibited the U.S. Federal Government in Washington, D.C. from passing laws which restricted the rights and individual liberties of Americans, especially rights relating to freedom of speech, the press and religious expression.
Although this initial enquiry began with a question about rock 'n' roll on the radio, it soon mushroomed into many diverse additional questions and parallel lines of investigation. Using the concept of perspective, those seemingly unrelated lines of research have converged into one moment in time with the establishment of the Post Office. It began as an institution in the year 1635 when the General Post Office was created by authority of King Charles I. But it was not seen as a means of facilitating communication between individuals, but as a means of censoring the activities of the subjugated people under his control.
King Charles I claimed sovereignty of both the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland via an institution known as the Crown. This entity is known in law as a corporation sole, and it began in its formulative stage in 1516 when King Henry VIII of England grasped power from the Papacy in Rome. Because Henry VIII asserted his own version of spiritual control over the subjugated human lives under his domination, as well as the temporal power to control the geographical land mass upon which they lived, he created a Master of Posts as a means of controlling by censorship, what his subjugated people were writing to each other.
By the time we reach the time of King Charles I, several interrelated civil wars began in England, Scotland and Ireland, and sides were drawn in battle with Lt Colonel John Lilburne fighting on the side of the English Parliamentarians. Eventually Lilburne's side emerged victorious and the king was executed by Parliamentary forces under the authority of Oliver Cromwell. Then, without a written constitution to stop his rise to dictatorship, he turned on John Lilburne and imprisoned Lilburne for the rest of his life. (More about Lilburne's own fight for individual liberty as this story unfolds.)
Although the twin monarchies of England and Scotland were ruled by one king, the monarchy ceased to exist after 1649. Cromwell did not abolish the Crown corporation sole. He converted it into his own device so that his son could eventually succeed him. But when Cromwell died in 1657, his son turned down the job, and a military coup d'état took place under the leadership of General George Monck.
This military man switched sides, and later, Benedict Arnold did the same thing during the American Revolution. In fact, Arnold even adopted the name 'Monck' as his secret code identity. But in Arnold's case, George Washington won and King George III lost. In the instance of George Monck he was successful in overthrowing the united republic, and then placing the son of the executed Charles I on two new thrones, in England and in Scotland. The year 1660, and one of the first things that Monck accomplished was to palm-off King Charles II as the immediate successor to King Charles I. How this was accomplished is a story in itself, but here is the basic outline:
First, the Crown corporation sole that was represented by King Charles I until 1649, became the encapsulation of a united republican sovereignty dominated by Oliver Cromwell until 1660, when it was converted back to representing two new and separate kingdom. The period between 1649 and 1660 was titled the 'Interregnum'. But this was no 'interruption' of the monarchy. Two kingdoms had been terminated, a single unified republic had taken their place. Two new kingdoms were created, one in England and one in Scotland. Those two kingdoms were not united, they merely shared the same king. Thus two separate monarchical dynasties had been created until the two kingdoms were united following another overthrow of the monarchy and an invasion by Dutch forces.
To make sure that the interim years under the united republic did not become a renewed topic of political discussion, 'An Act of Oblivion' was passed into law in 1660, and it forbade any mention of events before that year. This new law of censorship, carried penalties, if it was not obeyed. To make sure that written communications did not violate this law of censorship, on December 29, 1660, a Post Office Act took control of the distribution of letters.
Now jump ahead from 1660 to 1964, and over the ensuing years this same General Post Office (GPO) took over not only the mail, but the telegraph and the telephone as well. The Crown GPO accomplished this by claiming that by extension, all point-to-point communications requiring exchange switching, were no more, no less than electronic post offices. Thus they were subject to licensing by the Postmaster General. That was the system which Don Pierson tried to fight in 1964, beginning with his offshore station called 'Radio London.' In 1966, Pierson tried again with twin offshore stations called'Radio England' and 'Britain Radio'.
However, Don Pierson's Texan involvement began after learning about Charles Orr Stanley's 'Radio Caroline', except that Stanley had hidden both his own involvement and his reason for 'Radio Caroline.' Both remained behind a facade of nonsense relating to the simultaneous 'British Invasion' of the U.S. airwaves by musical groups such as the Beatles. Although the Beatles had begun their climb to fame long before'Radio Caroline' first came on the air during February 27, 1964, a young Irishman in his twenties named Ronan O'Rahilly had been to spin a tale of deceit.
Ronan O'Rahilly was pushed in front of the press to claim that he was the originator of 'Radio Caroline' in order to cover-up the plans and purpose behind the station called 'Radio Caroline' which originated with Charles Orr Stanley. Like O'Rahilly, Stanley's home was also located in the Republic of Ireland. At midnight on August 14, 1967, British offshore broadcasting became illegal following the passage into law of the Marine Offences Act.
In 1969, the GPO was abolished, and a new Post Office Act followed on to separate its control of the mail from its control of electronic communications by placing them under two new Crown entities. Following passage into law of the 1981 British Telecommunications Act, a stream of changes constantly moved control of electronic from one Crown entity to another.
However, between 1967 and 1990, ill-informed American media men who did not understand that the Crown is a monolithic creation and not comparable to the U.S. Constitution and its three, separate but equal divisions of government, had come to believe in the fictitious tale that a series of documents from Magna Carta to the so-called English Bill of Rights, guaranteed the same individual freedoms under law that Americans enjoy. In 1980, this misinformation enabled a U.S. based con man with organized crime connections, to swindle U.S. investors into investing money in more than one failed offshore radio venture.
In 1990, a major change took place in UK laws relating to the exploration and exploitation of North Sea gas and oil, and that resulted in the end of major commercial attempts at offshore radio broadcasting into the UK. But at the same time a new barrage of misinformation about the 1964 origins of 'Radio Caroline' was unleashed via books and especially with a BBC-TV documentary called 'A Pirate's Tale'. However, the broadcasting entity which goes by the initials 'BBC', and which is the beneficiary of Crown legislation regarding licensed broadcasting, has also engaged in its own campaign of deceit to conceal its own origins. Instead of claiming that it was created in 1927, the British Broadcasting Corporation falsely claimed that it had been created in 1922 in order to absorb the legacy of the British and American cartel known as the British Broadcasting Company Limited.
At the heart of this story is fear of what might happen to the British Crown, if the same freedoms that are enjoyed by individual Americans, also became freedoms enjoyed by inhabitants of the British Isles. The issue has never been about a lack of music, it has always been about religious and political freedom of speech on the airwaves and in the published press. This was the fear that expressed by King Charles I; Oliver Cromwell, King Charles II and onwards through the reign of Queen Elizabeth II. That is why she signed into law the Marine Offences Act of 1967.
The target of that law was not the prevention of music, but the prevention of political and religious speech over the offshore stations of the 1960s. Until then, the lid had been clamped upon the creation of all licensed British broadcasting, except for authorized religious and political speech that was permitted on the air in any featured form. Anything outside of the authorized viewpoint, including the Bible, was delegated to a demeaning footnote status.
However, in 1964, Don Pierson of Eastland, Texas did not understand this foundational problem. When 'Radio Caroline' was created as a part of a plan to force the licensing of more broadcasting stations, its major promoter was Charles Orr Stanley who represented the interests of the Pye Group of companies, and it was not in his interests to reveal that he was the primary promoter behind that offshore radio station. Instead, a series of 'front' entities were created and a spokesman named Ronan O'Rahilly was hired to spin a totally fake story that he had created 'Radio Caroline'.
To fund his first offshore broadcasting venture, Pierson relied upon a polemical paid broadcast that paid for the operating costs of 'Radio London'. Almost all of the other offshore stations then followed Pierson's lead by clearing airtime and accepting cash for broadcasting 'The World Tomorrow' radio program every day, and sometimes more than once a day. At its peak,'The World Tomorrow' was being heard in the early morning, at lunch time, in the early evening, in prime time and late at night throughout the British Isles.
Until January 1965 when the first offshore broadcasts of 'The World Tomorrow' were broadcast over 'Radio London', its creator remained a relatively small operation in an arm's length association with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The World Tomorrow' was transmitted over a number of 'front' CIA propaganda radio stations. When'The World Tomorrow' creators incorporated a British entity in 1959, they did so under the name of Ambassador College (UK) Limited. Its assets were small indeed, and it was clearly given a lot of preferential help to financially secure property in Hertfordshire which had once been the home of a pioneer of the British East India Company, and his daughter, who with J. Arthur Rank had founded Pinewood Studios.
'The World Tomorrow' was introduced and closed by Art Gilmore, a Hollywood announcer and actor, and the only music used in the program was an orchestral instrumental jingle created in Hollywood. The British tabloid press did not target Ambassador College, but a small tithe-paying church membership which remained very small. Eventually The World Tomorrow' broadcasts were mostly silenced by the Marine Offences Act, but rather than the press focusing their attention on the polemical broadcasts, they wrote about former offshore disc jockeys, even though tbhe BBC had given them employment. The BBC created a network station to broadcast music in the UK, but freedom of political and religious speech remained constrained. However, the now aging fans of this form of offshore broadcasting try to recall yet another yesterday that never happened.
'Radio Caroline' which began on February 27, 1964, turned into a dismal failure following the British General Election of October 15, 1964, because it closed the door to any possibility that 'Radio Caroline', would receive a British license. Its initiator was Charles Orr Stanley and he then turned his attention elsewhere. That left an ad hoc number of investors who turned to American interests in New York to help bale them out of financial trouble. Their distance management merely brought in the New York Mafia who were seeking criminal inroads into Europe, with assistance from domestic criminals such as the Kray Twins in England.
But now, thanks to the British ITV broadcast of 'Mr Bates versus Post Office' , which is described as"the extraordinary story of the greatest miscarriage of justice in British legal history, where hundreds of innocent sub-postmasters and postmistresses were wrongly accused of theft, fraud and false accounting due to a defective IT system", the mind of the public-at-large has been drawn to the thuggish nature of the British Crown. Its Post Office functioned under a system wherein the King is the law and can do no wrong, and that same system then shielded itself by sacrificing its minions who were the civil servants and government agents carrying out the wishes of the Crown. This is nothing new and it dates back to the reign of Henry VIII, but which was 'perfected' by King Charles II.
Now there is a King Charles III representing this same Crown corporation sole.
Nothing has changed.
The British Empire was built upon slavery for the few, but in reality the few were also the British Establishment who treated the residents of the British Isles as subservient subjects of the Crown. Their castles and stately homes may be good for the tourist industry today, but to those whose lives were destroyed in their creation for the few, their building blocks are merely uninscribed grave stones representing the many.
Although the combined work of the three co-authors ('The Trio'), has been documented in both courts of law, mainstream press, academic publications, both radio and television broadcast documentaries, and a series for a communications museum journal, it has not been commercially exploited due to its complexity. Due to the very recent (2024) four-part televised documentary about the cruelty inflicted upon British people by the British Crown via its Post Office system of censorship, maybe the time has come when the world will learn about the pioneering work of Freeborn John Lilburne.
Remaining untold is not only the true story behind CIA broadcasting activities, but the earlier and totally secretive broadcasting operations managed by Sefton Delmer during the WWII premiership of Winston Churchill. The obliteration of Don Pierson's involvement is merely part of this obfuscation of anything that is connected to the true story of British broadcasting.
At the heart of the current British Post Office scandal is the act of that first thrown pebble, or rock as Prince Charles described it. But this part-work goes to the heart and core of the problem. The problem is the United Kingdom itself. It is a fraud resting upon a bogus legal past. So, cutting to the chase, here, as a work in progress, is the real story in its simplified format. A later documented version will take longer to create, but it is also underway. The story told here has never been told in context before now.
Because our work has been previously stolen and then hammered as square pegs into round holes to join a false narrative, we ask readers who become aware of that kind of activity, please let us know.
"Why can't you play rock 'n' roll all day on the UK airwaves, but you can in the USA?"
That question soon mushroomed into many, just like ripples resulting from a single pebble being thrown into a calm body of water. Many parallel lines of investigation then commenced, and now, using the concept of perspective, these seemingly unrelated lines of research have converged into one moment in time beginning in 1635 with the creation of the Post Office. It was an entity created by authority of King Charles I who claimed sovereignty of both the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland.
The original question about rock 'n' roll being played on the airwaves resulted from actions taken by the Post Office. However, the Post Office did not censor the playing of rock 'n' roll, but the broadcasting of unauthorized religious and political points of view that paid for rock 'n' roll to be played on the air.
In late 1964, Don Pierson of Eastland, Texas began to work on a project that challenged the ability of the British Post Office to stifle freedom of the airwaves. His motivation was the guarantee of freedom which he was accustomed to as a citizen of the United States of America.
In 1980, the three co-authors begun their own individual association with Don Pierson, and he suggested that a further attempt should be made to restart 'Radio London' as a syndicated radio program in the USA. This was during the time that a new media phase had begun via the start of MTV to spark a new wave of interest in British popular music. That endeavor was not successful, but it was this project which sparked the initial question about playing of rock 'n' roll on the airwaves.
In 1985, the answer to that question was found in a copy of the 1968 Yearbook of Encyclopedia Britannica. It was located upon a shelf behind the control desk in a radio studio linked to the 'Radio London' syndication venture. That book contained an article of about five pages in length which had been published under the byline of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo L. Black. In it, he linked the origins of the U.S. Constitution of 1789, to a draft document written in1649, called 'An Agreement of the Free People of England'. It was the draft of a written constitution which owed its authorship in part to John Lilburne. Born in 1614, Lilburne became known as Freeborn John' during his lifetime which ended in the year 1657.
Hugo Black inspired the co-authors of this work to begin their own investigation into the family tree of John Lilburne. This led them to discover Lilburne's connections to the family of U.S. President Thomas Jefferson. It was Jefferson's input which in part resulted in the first amendments to the U.S. Constitution which became known as its 'Bill of Rights'. Those amendments prohibited the U.S. Federal Government in Washington, D.C. from passing laws which restricted the rights and individual liberties of Americans, especially rights relating to freedom of speech, the press and religious expression.
Although this initial enquiry began with a question about rock 'n' roll on the radio, it soon mushroomed into many diverse additional questions and parallel lines of investigation. Using the concept of perspective, those seemingly unrelated lines of research have converged into one moment in time with the establishment of the Post Office. It began as an institution in the year 1635 when the General Post Office was created by authority of King Charles I. But it was not seen as a means of facilitating communication between individuals, but as a means of censoring the activities of the subjugated people under his control.
King Charles I claimed sovereignty of both the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland via an institution known as the Crown. This entity is known in law as a corporation sole, and it began in its formulative stage in 1516 when King Henry VIII of England grasped power from the Papacy in Rome. Because Henry VIII asserted his own version of spiritual control over the subjugated human lives under his domination, as well as the temporal power to control the geographical land mass upon which they lived, he created a Master of Posts as a means of controlling by censorship, what his subjugated people were writing to each other.
By the time we reach the time of King Charles I, several interrelated civil wars began in England, Scotland and Ireland, and sides were drawn in battle with Lt Colonel John Lilburne fighting on the side of the English Parliamentarians. Eventually Lilburne's side emerged victorious and the king was executed by Parliamentary forces under the authority of Oliver Cromwell. Then, without a written constitution to stop his rise to dictatorship, he turned on John Lilburne and imprisoned Lilburne for the rest of his life. (More about Lilburne's own fight for individual liberty as this story unfolds.)
Although the twin monarchies of England and Scotland were ruled by one king, the monarchy ceased to exist after 1649. Cromwell did not abolish the Crown corporation sole. He converted it into his own device so that his son could eventually succeed him. But when Cromwell died in 1657, his son turned down the job, and a military coup d'état took place under the leadership of General George Monck.
This military man switched sides, and later, Benedict Arnold did the same thing during the American Revolution. In fact, Arnold even adopted the name 'Monck' as his secret code identity. But in Arnold's case, George Washington won and King George III lost. In the instance of George Monck he was successful in overthrowing the united republic, and then placing the son of the executed Charles I on two new thrones, in England and in Scotland. The year 1660, and one of the first things that Monck accomplished was to palm-off King Charles II as the immediate successor to King Charles I. How this was accomplished is a story in itself, but here is the basic outline:
First, the Crown corporation sole that was represented by King Charles I until 1649, became the encapsulation of a united republican sovereignty dominated by Oliver Cromwell until 1660, when it was converted back to representing two new and separate kingdom. The period between 1649 and 1660 was titled the 'Interregnum'. But this was no 'interruption' of the monarchy. Two kingdoms had been terminated, a single unified republic had taken their place. Two new kingdoms were created, one in England and one in Scotland. Those two kingdoms were not united, they merely shared the same king. Thus two separate monarchical dynasties had been created until the two kingdoms were united following another overthrow of the monarchy and an invasion by Dutch forces.
To make sure that the interim years under the united republic did not become a renewed topic of political discussion, 'An Act of Oblivion' was passed into law in 1660, and it forbade any mention of events before that year. This new law of censorship, carried penalties, if it was not obeyed. To make sure that written communications did not violate this law of censorship, on December 29, 1660, a Post Office Act took control of the distribution of letters.
Now jump ahead from 1660 to 1964, and over the ensuing years this same General Post Office (GPO) took over not only the mail, but the telegraph and the telephone as well. The Crown GPO accomplished this by claiming that by extension, all point-to-point communications requiring exchange switching, were no more, no less than electronic post offices. Thus they were subject to licensing by the Postmaster General. That was the system which Don Pierson tried to fight in 1964, beginning with his offshore station called 'Radio London.' In 1966, Pierson tried again with twin offshore stations called'Radio England' and 'Britain Radio'.
However, Don Pierson's Texan involvement began after learning about Charles Orr Stanley's 'Radio Caroline', except that Stanley had hidden both his own involvement and his reason for 'Radio Caroline.' Both remained behind a facade of nonsense relating to the simultaneous 'British Invasion' of the U.S. airwaves by musical groups such as the Beatles. Although the Beatles had begun their climb to fame long before'Radio Caroline' first came on the air during February 27, 1964, a young Irishman in his twenties named Ronan O'Rahilly had been to spin a tale of deceit.
Ronan O'Rahilly was pushed in front of the press to claim that he was the originator of 'Radio Caroline' in order to cover-up the plans and purpose behind the station called 'Radio Caroline' which originated with Charles Orr Stanley. Like O'Rahilly, Stanley's home was also located in the Republic of Ireland. At midnight on August 14, 1967, British offshore broadcasting became illegal following the passage into law of the Marine Offences Act.
In 1969, the GPO was abolished, and a new Post Office Act followed on to separate its control of the mail from its control of electronic communications by placing them under two new Crown entities. Following passage into law of the 1981 British Telecommunications Act, a stream of changes constantly moved control of electronic from one Crown entity to another.
However, between 1967 and 1990, ill-informed American media men who did not understand that the Crown is a monolithic creation and not comparable to the U.S. Constitution and its three, separate but equal divisions of government, had come to believe in the fictitious tale that a series of documents from Magna Carta to the so-called English Bill of Rights, guaranteed the same individual freedoms under law that Americans enjoy. In 1980, this misinformation enabled a U.S. based con man with organized crime connections, to swindle U.S. investors into investing money in more than one failed offshore radio venture.
In 1990, a major change took place in UK laws relating to the exploration and exploitation of North Sea gas and oil, and that resulted in the end of major commercial attempts at offshore radio broadcasting into the UK. But at the same time a new barrage of misinformation about the 1964 origins of 'Radio Caroline' was unleashed via books and especially with a BBC-TV documentary called 'A Pirate's Tale'. However, the broadcasting entity which goes by the initials 'BBC', and which is the beneficiary of Crown legislation regarding licensed broadcasting, has also engaged in its own campaign of deceit to conceal its own origins. Instead of claiming that it was created in 1927, the British Broadcasting Corporation falsely claimed that it had been created in 1922 in order to absorb the legacy of the British and American cartel known as the British Broadcasting Company Limited.
At the heart of this story is fear of what might happen to the British Crown, if the same freedoms that are enjoyed by individual Americans, also became freedoms enjoyed by inhabitants of the British Isles. The issue has never been about a lack of music, it has always been about religious and political freedom of speech on the airwaves and in the published press. This was the fear that expressed by King Charles I; Oliver Cromwell, King Charles II and onwards through the reign of Queen Elizabeth II. That is why she signed into law the Marine Offences Act of 1967.
The target of that law was not the prevention of music, but the prevention of political and religious speech over the offshore stations of the 1960s. Until then, the lid had been clamped upon the creation of all licensed British broadcasting, except for authorized religious and political speech that was permitted on the air in any featured form. Anything outside of the authorized viewpoint, including the Bible, was delegated to a demeaning footnote status.
However, in 1964, Don Pierson of Eastland, Texas did not understand this foundational problem. When 'Radio Caroline' was created as a part of a plan to force the licensing of more broadcasting stations, its major promoter was Charles Orr Stanley who represented the interests of the Pye Group of companies, and it was not in his interests to reveal that he was the primary promoter behind that offshore radio station. Instead, a series of 'front' entities were created and a spokesman named Ronan O'Rahilly was hired to spin a totally fake story that he had created 'Radio Caroline'.
To fund his first offshore broadcasting venture, Pierson relied upon a polemical paid broadcast that paid for the operating costs of 'Radio London'. Almost all of the other offshore stations then followed Pierson's lead by clearing airtime and accepting cash for broadcasting 'The World Tomorrow' radio program every day, and sometimes more than once a day. At its peak,'The World Tomorrow' was being heard in the early morning, at lunch time, in the early evening, in prime time and late at night throughout the British Isles.
Until January 1965 when the first offshore broadcasts of 'The World Tomorrow' were broadcast over 'Radio London', its creator remained a relatively small operation in an arm's length association with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The World Tomorrow' was transmitted over a number of 'front' CIA propaganda radio stations. When'The World Tomorrow' creators incorporated a British entity in 1959, they did so under the name of Ambassador College (UK) Limited. Its assets were small indeed, and it was clearly given a lot of preferential help to financially secure property in Hertfordshire which had once been the home of a pioneer of the British East India Company, and his daughter, who with J. Arthur Rank had founded Pinewood Studios.
'The World Tomorrow' was introduced and closed by Art Gilmore, a Hollywood announcer and actor, and the only music used in the program was an orchestral instrumental jingle created in Hollywood. The British tabloid press did not target Ambassador College, but a small tithe-paying church membership which remained very small. Eventually The World Tomorrow' broadcasts were mostly silenced by the Marine Offences Act, but rather than the press focusing their attention on the polemical broadcasts, they wrote about former offshore disc jockeys, even though tbhe BBC had given them employment. The BBC created a network station to broadcast music in the UK, but freedom of political and religious speech remained constrained. However, the now aging fans of this form of offshore broadcasting try to recall yet another yesterday that never happened.
'Radio Caroline' which began on February 27, 1964, turned into a dismal failure following the British General Election of October 15, 1964, because it closed the door to any possibility that 'Radio Caroline', would receive a British license. Its initiator was Charles Orr Stanley and he then turned his attention elsewhere. That left an ad hoc number of investors who turned to American interests in New York to help bale them out of financial trouble. Their distance management merely brought in the New York Mafia who were seeking criminal inroads into Europe, with assistance from domestic criminals such as the Kray Twins in England.
But now, thanks to the British ITV broadcast of 'Mr Bates versus Post Office' , which is described as"the extraordinary story of the greatest miscarriage of justice in British legal history, where hundreds of innocent sub-postmasters and postmistresses were wrongly accused of theft, fraud and false accounting due to a defective IT system", the mind of the public-at-large has been drawn to the thuggish nature of the British Crown. Its Post Office functioned under a system wherein the King is the law and can do no wrong, and that same system then shielded itself by sacrificing its minions who were the civil servants and government agents carrying out the wishes of the Crown. This is nothing new and it dates back to the reign of Henry VIII, but which was 'perfected' by King Charles II.
Now there is a King Charles III representing this same Crown corporation sole.
Nothing has changed.
The British Empire was built upon slavery for the few, but in reality the few were also the British Establishment who treated the residents of the British Isles as subservient subjects of the Crown. Their castles and stately homes may be good for the tourist industry today, but to those whose lives were destroyed in their creation for the few, their building blocks are merely uninscribed grave stones representing the many.
Although the combined work of the three co-authors ('The Trio'), has been documented in both courts of law, mainstream press, academic publications, both radio and television broadcast documentaries, and a series for a communications museum journal, it has not been commercially exploited due to its complexity. Due to the very recent (2024) four-part televised documentary about the cruelty inflicted upon British people by the British Crown via its Post Office system of censorship, maybe the time has come when the world will learn about the pioneering work of Freeborn John Lilburne.
Remaining untold is not only the true story behind CIA broadcasting activities, but the earlier and totally secretive broadcasting operations managed by Sefton Delmer during the WWII premiership of Winston Churchill. The obliteration of Don Pierson's involvement is merely part of this obfuscation of anything that is connected to the true story of British broadcasting.
At the heart of the current British Post Office scandal is the act of that first thrown pebble, or rock as Prince Charles described it. But this part-work goes to the heart and core of the problem. The problem is the United Kingdom itself. It is a fraud resting upon a bogus legal past. So, cutting to the chase, here, as a work in progress, is the real story in its simplified format. A later documented version will take longer to create, but it is also underway. The story told here has never been told in context before now.
Because our work has been previously stolen and then hammered as square pegs into round holes to join a false narrative, we ask readers who become aware of that kind of activity, please let us know.
Use this button for general comments about this topic.
|
|
On October 20, 1985, Prince Charles, now King Charles III, sat on a couch with Diana. She was his wife at that time. He responded to a question asked by Alastair Burnet of Independent Television News. Charles provided us with a description of our presentation called Pebble Theatre:
|
".... Uh, I just feel that sometimes, not too often, uh, I can, I can throw a rock into a pond and, and watch the ripples, um, create a certain amount of discussion .... "
Return to Index
Editing in progress preparatory for a print edition.
This text remains fluid and subject to change.
This text remains fluid and subject to change.
Copyright 2024 by Yesterday Never Happened (UK) Ltd