A British propaganda machine was turned on yesterday to proclaim these words:
This is political propaganda designed to force you into making a decision that is based upon a false premise!
"The Queen was the monarchy, the monarchy was the Queen. Whatever the truth of her life, mythology and deference have shaped how people view this archaic institution."
That statement begins this article, and taken at face value, it is true, but when it is considered within the context of the Crown institution that Queen Elizabeth represented, it is 100% false!
This same piece of political propaganda continues with these words about Queen Elizabeth, who was only 'number two' in England, because she was only the first 'Queen Elizabeth' in Scotland. However, the writer sidesteps that issue by referring to the Queen as "her" ....
"Her death leaves the monarchy in trouble, with the uninspiring Charles and William carrying the flame, while Andrew and Harry – for very different reasons – pour fuel on embers of discontent. But it isn’t just about one family, this is an institution well past its time, one that sets itself against the principles most of us think are important, values such as democracy, equality and the rule of law. It is, by its very nature, undemocratic."
Now this is where the 'magic' sleight of hand takes place:
One minute we are discussing a 'royal family', which is interchanged with the term 'monarchy', and the next minute we are discussing an 'institution'. But the 'institution' in question is not this 'royal family', but an institution called the 'Crown' which is defined in law as a corporation sole.
In lay terms a corporation sole is where the non-human artificial entity is linked to one human person as its sovereign representative, and when that human person dies, another human person immediately takes their place: "The Queen is dead, long live the King!"
One minute the representative is named Elizabeth, and the next minute the representative is named Charles.
But the institution of the Crown is not terminated, it continues on because under the system of law that created this corporation sole, it is in fact a dictatorship: it is the law and there can be no higher power - except for God - which is where the Crown in England claims to derive its authority.
So if the monarch dies, then who is running the Crown?
The Privy Council.
It has a large membership, but at is core is a very secretive form of continuing organization and that is where the power behind the Crown actually resides. Years ago Tony Benn discovered this anomaly and he even wrote a booklet for the Fabian Society about it. We have a copy of it in our library! Benn wanted to scrap the House of Lords and replace it with the ready-to-go Privy Council. He was obviously unsuccessful and he was then attacked (often unfairly) at every turn. The Privy Council does not want this true account of what the British Crown is, to be revealed to the hoi polloi. You might get upset if you know the true story.
To trace back the history of the Crown in England, we have to go back to its King Henry VIII, who was on England's throne from 1509 until his death in 1547. King Henry VIII was the King of England, he was not the King of Scotland.
In Scotland, during the time of England's King Henry III, King James IV sat on the throne. He was there from 1488 until his death in 1513, but there was a big difference between those two monarchs and what they individually represented.
King Henry VIII of England claimed supreme power over both the 'spiritual' (religious) and political lives of "his" subjects. He claimed that his authority came only from God. But in Scotland, King James IV only claimed to be the 'King of Scots', and not the boss of everything and everyone. King James IV knew that he ruled by the grace of the political machine that represented the people living in Scotland.
King James IV of Scotland was followed by King James V of Scotland while King Henry VIII was still on his throne in England. It was not until a quirk in the dynasty of King Henry VIII occurred upon his death in 1647, that for his next-in-line, the Crown in England looked to the Kingdom of Scotland for help. That help came when Scotland's King James VI moved his base from Edinburgh to London, and that is where he also became King James V of England - while still remaining as King James VI of Scotland. This is why calling the now deceased Queen, Elizabeth II when she was the first Elizabeth in Scotland, is a sham. That myth was concocted by none other than the deceased Sir Winston Churchill. But the now departed Queen Elizabeth II of England was in fact the first Queen Elizabeth in Scotland!
So where did all this confusion come from?
We invite you to read our monologue on this blog that preceded this edition.
The sham began not with King Henry VIII, but with the Papacy in Rome and the bogus claim which the Papacy now freely admit was a fraudulent claim. It goes like this: The Roman Emperor Constantine who came from York in England, ended up in what is now present-day Turkey.
This man, according to a fraudulent document called the 'Donation of Constantine', gave one of the Popes the Western half of the Roman Empire, and that is how the Popes allegedly became both Head of a Church and Head of all lessor rulers such as kings and queens. It was this myth in which Constantine made Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire by which the Emperor ruled the spiritual and temporal lives of everyone under his jurisdiction. So when Constantine allegedly gave away the Western half of the Roman Empire to the Papacy, well along with it went the power to rule the spiritual and temporal power of the Emperor.
Now the Pope was the 'big boss' representing God on Earth.
Not everyone bought into this nonsense. Both Luther and Calvin continued to harp on about this lie, long after its falsity was admitted, because the political machine kept it alive for political purposes. Even the Scottish 'Declaration of Arbroath' of 1320 told the Pope of that day to get his vassal King Edward I to stop invading the Kingdom of Scotland, or else the Kingdom of Scotland which in theory was also subject to the power of the Pope, would simply take matters into its own hands.
But in reality the Western half of the Roman Empire was never ruled by any Pope on behalf of God, and today at Vatican City they will proudly show you the fake documents in their 'secret' library. It is a present-day tourist attraction!
In fact, while a lot of the European kings gave no thought to the 'Donation of Constantine' in England it came to serve a sinister political service. It was England's King Henry VIII who grabbed hold of that fake Papal claim, and this is how King Henry VIII became both the Head of his new Church of England, and Head of the political realm in England.
To make sure you do not grasp any of this, the Crown and its broadcasting child called the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), have rammed this fiction down the throats of everyone using so-called 'historical drama' to do it. What the BBC is covering-up is the irrelevant back story about Henry VIII who ordered ax men to chop off the heads of women he did not like.
It is a horror story, and everyone focusses upon the brutal and thuggish actions of this idiotic man who really did order that the heads of women he did not like, to be chopped off. So everyone focuses upon that, and not on the really important back story - the source of his claimed power.
It was made up. He didn't have it, except by de facto 'might make right' power of dictatorship. The rule of a thug. Chopping off heads was a distraction. It was not about divorce. It was about political power - the power to control money, the treasury: What's mine is mine and what's yours is mine! Say otherwise and you will die!
Now how the current movement for Scottish independence is ever going to achieve victory by telling people a lie that their loss of sovereignty began in 1707 with Scotland becoming part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, is a mystery. The year 1707 was long before Ireland was added to the mix in 1801, or even the earlier succession of the thirteen North American colonies. They declared independence in 1776 from the British Crown in order to initially create a confederacy called the United States of America. (The federal nation of the same name came later.)
But it is from this same murky, deceitful and totally fictitious story involving King Henry VIII that the British General Post Office was born under the direction of King Charles II and his boss, General George Monck from Coldstream in Scotland. Monck is the man who pulled off this fraud in 1660, and he was so successful in switching sides from the Cromwellian republic that proceeded Charles II, that over in America it inspired General Benedict Arnold to do the same thing, and fail.
Using the code name of 'Monck', Benedict Arnold dumped Washington's forces because he thought they were going to lose, and Arnold then began fighting for the British, but unlike the English under Charles II, they lost. So on the one hand General George Monck became the hero of the new Crown royalists under Charles II, while one hundred years or so later, General Benedict Arnold went down in patriotic stories told to American kids, about how Arnold became an American traitor.
But what does any of this have to do with 'Radio Caroline'?
This is the real story of how the British Crown came to claim that all forms of communication in the British Isles had to be licensed by the British Crown. It is the back story of how Freeborn John Lilburne became a 'pirate publisher', and how we first stumbled on to the truth about these wild and spurious claims about authority claimed by the British Crown.
King Charles III is merely today's Crown puppet.
Charles III must surely know the real story and he must surely know that he is a fake - another great pretender claiming to be what he is not you see. Charles III should tell everyone the real story. He should spill the beans and tell the truth. But will he?
What Charles III will do is anyone's guess, but if Charles III attempts to tell the truth, would he then meet a fate similar to the one his deceased former wife met one night in a tunnel?
Time will tell, and so will we.
[CORRECTIONS: If you spot copy-related typographical errors, please report them via our Comments link.]
To answer that question a person has to know that the claims are false, and that the hoax that it supports is controlling their every day life in a most undemocratic manner. Voting in or out a political party will never effect change, and for this reason we now identify the fact that you own one of those two keys, but it was stolen from your possession by a polemical machine which in bygone years tried to rule much of the world.
Back in 1988 that is what the movement called Charter 88 eventually discovered: you cannot impose change upon a de facto power that claims superior power of sovereignty. So we now offer you "one key free" to unlock this mystery: look at the symbol of the two keys. One of them represents the falsely claimed power to control your religious views, and the other one represents the falsely claimed power to control your political views. But it is the political key that unlocks the power of the military which can enforce the idea that 'might make right'. This is the reason why under this system, weapons that will protect an individual are confiscated, while combined weapons of war that randomly seek to kill and destroy are left in the hands of a political machine that is unelected and which makes its decisions in secret.
The original symbol of this power are two crossed keys. One representing organized State religion, and one representing organized State political power. It is not a new symbol, it is a symbol that is hidden in plain sight.
The idea that the spin-off entity in the British Isles which was created by using the powers represented by the symbol of those two keys has been reformed by democratic rule, is not just a farce, it is also a lie. But it is a lie that is smothered in obfuscation.
The original lie involved a man name Constantine who gained his power while he was at York in England. The next part of the lie involves Constantine claiming control of the world and giving away the western half to the Papacy in Rome. It is their symbol of two keys that is pictured above.
The next villain is England's King Henry VIII. He has been drowned in a sea of tales about women he liked, did not like and women he murdered. But that story is a means of distraction. After breaking with Rome, King Henry VIII of England merely assumed the 'spiritual' and 'temporal' powers of the Papacy which are symbolized by those two keys. But of course the Papacy never had those powers to begin with. Even though Henry VIII was only the King of England, that same idea that the monarchy in London obtained those powers means that this myth had to have been 'passed-off' to the monarchs who followed so that when the Kingdom of England initially entered into a partnership with Scotland to form the Kingdom of Great Britain, it became assumed that collectively, the British monarchy also had those powers.
But it does not.
What the Kingdom of Great Britain had created was form of dictatorship, which has left minor decisions to the hoi polloi. The governance that mattered once enabled the British military to enslave, kill and destroy wherever and whenever they could, in order to plunder and steal, and it enabled the select few to begin building stately homes all over the British Isles.
In North America there was a rebellion, and due to the Atlantic Ocean it made it easier to form a defence against the marauding British troops and their supporting mercenaries who killed and destroyed for pay. While the initial break took place in 1776, the British kept on attacking the United States of America, so that by the dawn of the Twentieth Century, massive war plans were being drawn-up for the United Kingdom as it was now known, to attack the USA once more.
Those plans swirled around during the aftermath of World War I, and they were only scuttled by the approaching clouds coming from the beginnings of a World War II.
The idea of 'Special Relationship' between the USA and UK is nonsense, unless you mean the on-again, off-again spy information shared because of the threats of a nuclear World War III.
Whereas the USA created a written constitution to spell out the organic laws which underpin that nation, the UK has no written constitution and its mass of messy documents dating back to the first Magna Carta, are nothing more than factions dictating terms to the Crown. But they are not foundational documents protecting your rights if you live in the British Isles because you are a subject, not a citizen and you have been bluffed into thinking that you have no organic freeborn rights. You only have privileges to be given and taken away.
King Henry VIII brought this farce to a showdown using women he married and murdered as a means to an end of separation from the Papacy in Rome. King Henry VIII of England was previously a mere vassal of the Papacy, and so were all the Scottish kings prior to the establishment of a unified kingdom. So Henry VIII terminated the game in which he was a lessor king to the superior ruler in Rome.
But what England's King Henry VIII did was merely shun the primary ruler in Rome, and take for himself the same powers that the ruler in Rome claimed to have.
However, the ruler in Rome never had those powers in the first place, because his claim was based upon a hoax whose origins began at York in England. It is a hoax still commemorated in York by a statue dedicated to the Roman Emperor Constantine:
From a convoluted and totally false tale, now freely admitted by the owner of the symbol of the two keys, comes the fake authority to which Britain's new King Charles III has submitted himself to. It was one of his very first public acts that he in engaged in as the new monarch.
The power represented by those two keys is the means by which the freeborn rights of every person living in the British Isles have stolen and in place of the obfuscated truth, is domination by means of false claims that are still administered by the British Crown corporation sole.
Decades ago we joined Charter 88 after learning about Freeborn John Lilburne, because we thought at the time that Charter 88 (formed in 1988), could create a supreme written constitution for the people of the United Kingdom, but it could not. Power of the people from the bottom, can never be imposed on the secret power of the inner core workings of the Crown corporation sole at the top. Proof of our own education in this regard can still be heard on our old 4FWS documentary broadcasts, and you can hear them at:
A few days ago we began this Blog with these words: "While we began this research project in 1985 with the question: “Why can you play rock and roll all day on the radio in America, but not in the United Kingdom?” - we have continued to move on in a step by slow and methodical step - until we have now arrived at a point in time of being able to define the foundation of our research project."
Our research has now revealed a story that has remained untold elsewhere, and while it spins-off into the chronology of broadcasting events in both the United States and the United Kingdom, at its core is the story of individual freeborn rights. Those are the equal cerebral rights that every human being is born with, but which few people seem to exercise.
A human being may lose mobility any number of ways, but the 'spark' that separates human beings from the animal world has yet to be defined by anyone in a scientific and provable manner. Yet the fact that we can't define it does not mean that it does not exist. Over the centuries many have tried and many have turned those attempts into religious fervor. But that is not our purpose.
Our questioning focuses upon one of the people who claim hereditary rights in order to enslave and dominate millions of other human beings. That was the 'spirit' behind the creation of the British Empire. It was not a 'spirit' of freeborn individuality. But it was this issue that led to our question about rock and roll and a man named John Lilburne. We were introduced to John Lilburne by the writings of the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo L. Black, and his written Opinions that are recorded in the published U.S. Constitutional decisions that have been issued by the U.S. Supreme Court.
But John Reith came from the stock who worshipped a king over the temporal world that governed land and people, while distancing themselves from any king or queen who placed himself or herself over the spiritual world as the head of a State church. That is where King Henry VIII came in. He broke with the Papacy in Rome which claimed to govern by State and Church, and so he claimed to be the King of England and the Head of the Church of England.
John Reith was a contradiction. While his father celebrated a King who broke with the dual idea of temporal and spiritual governance promoted by King Henry VIII, by claiming only to be king of the earthly kingdom of Scotland, and not the Church of Scotland, that same king had invaded and conquered both England and Scotland and retained control as head of the Church of England. When John Reith took up his second position as Director General of the Crown licensed British Broadcasting Corporation, he did so in London, England.
The King that John Reith served at the BBC in London, was Head of the Church of England. Reith was first named Managing Director of the British Broadcasting Company Limited, a cartel modeled along lines of the General Electric Company of the USA. The British version, like its American parent, was designed to be a Trust where patents could be pooled in order to overcome the problems of competition.
Reith used his 'bully pulpit' at the BBC to tell everyone how they should live, and he did this in writing within his 1924 book called 'Broadcast Over Britain'. That book was published one year after the formation of the current manifestation of the United Kingdom, which makes the UK considerably younger as a nation than the United States of America.
The BBC is not an institution based upon telling the truth, but it promotes the idea that it is a conveyor of truth and understanding. However, in 2022, the BBC is going out of its way to tell the world that it is 100 years old, when in fact it was created in 1927, and the years in between do not add up to one hundred. If the BBC plays mind tricks, so did John Reith.
According to his daughter Reith's lifestyle was nothing like his propaganda regarding the teachings of the Church in Scotland. Reith's father was an esteemed Church minister, and in 1914, before John Reith was born, his father Rev. Dr. Reith went to the Scottish islands of the Outer Hebrides on missionary business.
It was in those 'Outer Isles' of Scotland that these photographs were taken during the three week visit by Dr. Reith, and during which time he engaged in singing a song ....
This song celebrates the legacy of the Covenanters, who the English enjoyed murdering by the hundreds because they would not accept the King of England as head of the Church in Scotland. The 'problem' with these people was that their religious views did not conform to the views of the English. The Covenanters were like the Jews who had settled in England centuries before. They had previously fallen victim to England's King Edward I, and that was centuries before Heinrich Himmler entertained similar ideas about exterminating people he did not like.
The song that Reith's father sang about the Covenanters has lyrics that tell a story about being outlaws fighting the King of England, and then making peace with the Crown when King William of the land we now know as Holland, invaded and conquered the British Isles. The reigning King James II was forced to flee and the invading Dutch army chased him through the island of Great Britain to the island of Ireland.
Today, King William is known in the northern counties of Ireland as 'King Billy', and due to Brexit and the semi-liberation of Ireland, the remaining counties in the north are still a hotbed of controversy that could flare-up into a civil war once again, as they did during in the Nineteen Seventies.
This entire fiasco relates back to King Henry VIII who broke away from the domination of the Pope who was both Head of a Church and the Head of a State. Henry VIII and his counterpart in Scotland, were both subservient to that authority. But that authority claimed by the Papacy was itself a fraud resting upon a document called the 'Donation of Constantine'. However, that did not stop King Henry VIII from basing his authority to rule his breakaway Church of England and his earthly kingdom upon a power which had been faked by a bygone Pope's cronies.
The mythology behind this story begins with Constantine at York in England. Constantine eventually became Emperor of the Roman Empire, and it is a convoluted story stretching over centuries that resulted in the myth that he had given a Pope, the western half of the Roman Empire. With the weird world of Henry VIII of England and the women who he married and murdered, the tabloid 'historians' have focused upon the sensational account of his sex life, rather than the means by which he established his own theocracy in England. That is the story we are untangling, because it is a complicated story behind Reith, the BBC, and the reason why the Post Office was formed in 1660 as a means of censoring all communications.
The war against individual freedom in the British Isles is a war founded upon a lie that the Establishment has admitted is a lie, and yet, that lie is passed on from generation to generation and it will soon become a part of the coronation of King Charles III.
It is also the central lie that we intend to strip down to its basic rhetoric in order show how it also forms the backbone of the war that was fought and lost, by the original 'Radio Caroline', and may yet rear its ugly head in violence within the unresolved saga involving the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland in the wake of Brexit. It is a lie that goes back to London, England, and the reign of its King Henry VIII.
To understand the geopolitical world of today as seen and heard via the British Broadcasting Corporation, it is necessary to put all of these events in context, without trying to sound like 'historians', which we are not and do not claim to be. However, it is only by understanding how this corrupted story of political life in the British Isles has evolved, that you and everyone else, will be able to make sense of the Crown dominated Acts of Parliament, such as the one that follows. Note its wording. We have intentionally redacted the text to focus upon the words: "consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal" ....
Our recital will continue on both Blogs. On the Fragile Forum we will deal with in-depth issues that arise in the podcast formula that will appear on the Pebble Theatre Blog. Comments will only be posted if they specifically relate to information that appears on either of our two Blogs, and real names must by used.
While we began this research project in 1985 with the question: “Why can you play rock and roll all day on the radio in America, but not in the United Kingdom?” - we have continued to move on in a step by slow and methodical step - until we have now arrived at a point in time of being able to define the foundation of our research project.
We gave it the name of YesterCode.
The year was 2003, and from that new starting date we moved on to expand the focus of our research to include an examination of the roots of law in the British Isles. Those laws then became the roots of law in the United States of America. Consequently we have restructured our organization to incorporate a library, a screening facility and conference room with the combined name of the JLRI Center.
By only focusing upon events, and by not placing those events within the boundaries of genealogy; chronology, and geography, events are taken out of context. Why that omission is important is because when we first began our quest with that very first question: “Why can you play rock and roll all day on the radio in America, but not in the United Kingdom?” - we did not understand that question within the context of life itself.
In fact, at this very moment in time and while writing these words, in the background can be heard the Crown licensed entity called 'BBC', and they are broadcasting a repetitious hailing of "God Save the King!". The BBC coverage has included reference to the "Lords Spiritual and the Lords Temporal", which dates back centuries to 1531 CE, and grab for power by King Henry VIII of England from Pope Clement VII.
That Pope based his authority to rule both his church and his state upon a fraudulent document called'The Donation of Constantine'. It is document concerning an alleged conveyance of the western half of the Roman Empire by Emperor Constantine. But that document is a fake.
The event was alleged to have taken place during the reign of Pope Sylvester I. He occupied his throne from 315 to 335 CE, but in reality, The Donation of Constantine' was probably written during the time of Pope Steven II (752-768 CE).
It was not proved to be a forgery until a priest and scholar named Lorenzo Valla (1407-1457 CE) came along. However, the fraud lived on, and in 1531 CE, King Henry VIII of England used this big lie to his own advantage in order to create his combined Church of England and Kingdom of England.
But the bogus history of the United Kingdom does not begin there. The UK was still way off in the future. There were many more lies upon lies to be added before the creation of that entity.
The first intermediary phase ended with King Charles I having his head chopped of in 1649 CE, and then the Kingdom of England ceased to exist. That event was followed by a dictatorship which continually morphed its way until the former Kingdom of Scotland was fused for a very brief time into a united republic!
General George Monck then gathered his army in Coldstream, Scotland and staged a coup d'état that placed the son of the executed King Charles I on a new throne. He became King Charles II. One of his first acts was to sign the 'Act of Oblivion' which made it a crime to refer to anything that happened between 1649 CE and 1660 CE. The Crown called that period the 'Interregnum'.
That is when King Charles II created the General Post Office as a means of censoring the mails.
This was the foundation for banning (censoring) all stories that are not acceptable to the Crown, and that included the creation of 'Radio Caroline'. On a more serious topic today, it is also provides the foundation for banning all media that originates in Russia. Only one side of a story can be officially told, and that story is the official story as told in the name of the British Crown.
"God Save the King"!
'Radio Caroline' came in 1964, but the true story about why it was created has yet to be told. It was then banned on August 14, 1967, using a barrage of fake information. It is not information from Russia that the peoples of the British Isles need to fear, but misinformation from the British Crown.
"God Save the King"!
The Crown is a corporation sole, it is not King Charles III.
But Charles, today, on BBC, you had your opportunity to tell the truth, but the BBC carried your own message of misinformation with the farce of so-called British "history" and "tradition". It is a tradition of lies and a history of misinformation, as you must know only too well.
There is no official "content within context" within your message, and no wonder: your message does not make logical sense. It is a disjointed mix of various fables all spun with the help of pageantry. The masses love the deaths of famous people. They love to gather at the gates and bid farewell to the departed. They did this for another king whose first name is Elvis.
We do not gather at the gates of the departed by in the libraries of the world. We do so because those who have stolen our research material and then republished it under their own name in vain self-glory - do so without understanding what they had stolen. They redistribute it to be absorbed by a gullible and foolish cult called anoraks.
We are engaged in a war against misinformation war that is being waged by the those who are now screaming at full volume: "God Save the King"!
Today, in London, the Privy Council gathered once more to serve the Crown with their new figurehead named King Charles III. They went through a ceremony of reciting words that the idiot anorak community claims do not matter. Yet, these same anoraks are now paying homage to the departed Queen. They do not seem to grasp the fact that the past is also their future, and yet, the anorak past never happened.
By not being stampeded into publishing an overarching and comprehensive account of our work at this time, but by methodically documenting it in published monologues, we have now established a foundation upon which we can publish an authentic and overarching and comprehensive account of past events.
We will continue to update the progress of our work on this Blog, and present even more focused accounts of our research on our 'Pebble Theatre' Blog.
It is time to put away your hankies and face the cold, hard facts of life, there is now a King Charles III waiting to get the stamp of approval from the Crown corporation sole. You can read what this means for everyone who wonders why the airwaves of the British Isles are censored. Click the 'Pebble Theatre' button above to read today's Blog.
Back on February 12, 2002, a man name Donald Rumsfeld gave an answer to a reporter that gained as much notoriety as it did wonderment: what did he mean when he said:
"Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because, as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know."
We know that Jimmy Ross is a myth.
We also know that the events he is associated with came from a novel written in 1990. That is what we know. There was a time that we did not know that Jimmy Ross is a myth.
Now there are known unknowns about the true origins of the financing of 'Radio Caroline' in 1964
That is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But knowing that we don't know the things that are to be known causes us to continue our research. But while there are also unknown unknowns, there are things we did not know that we do know now.
Where the entire anorak 'Caroline' cult gets shipwrecked is when it tries to explain who funded 'Radio Caroline' in 1964, and why?
Here is their problem:
Although the radio ship named 'Caroline' went on the air about a month after February 27, 1964, the only company associated with Ronan O'Rahilly and 'Radio Caroline' was not formed until February 27, 1964. But the ship and its transmitters had all been bought and installed long before February 27, 1964.
How was that possible?
The anoraks turn to the myth of 'Jimmy Ross' for an explanation.
That is why the anoraks need the mythology of 'Jimmy Ross', but although this phantom name had been reported in a news item in 1964, that is all that had been reported. The details about this fantasy figure were not published until 1990, and then they appeared in a novel.
More than this, the novel never mentioned a 'Jimmy Ross', the latter-day cult of anoraks have invented that name and joined it to the fictitious story in the novel. The novel never mentions Ronan O'Rahilly, and it never mentions a ship named 'Caroline'.
There is a mention of a man named 'Jim', but his last name in the novel is 'Shaw'.
The anoraks have created a religious cult about the man in the novel who is also called 'Jimmy'.
Paul Rusling's fictitious 'bible' gives the anoraks a fairy story to follow and recite - which they do.
Because we know for a fact that a radio ship named 'Caroline' did begin broadcasting in 1964, and because we also know for a fact that in 2022 no one, that's right, no one has offered any authentic documented explanation as to how that happened in such a way that a court of law would accept it as the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
On the other hand, we know that the anorak yesterday never happened, so we have been and we still are working on finding out who started 'Radio Caroline' and why they started it.
You will soon find out the real story and why the so-called tribute station on '648' is a tribute to a myth.
While Malcolm Smith ("Peter Moore") has temporarily emerged as the 'winner' in the Bob Meade ("Freddie Archer") game of lies and distortions among con men, it is time for us to move on. Those who have been attempting to replace fact with fiction on two rival anorak Forums, have now turned to mystification about how they will both deal with the legacy of fraud created by their patron saint, Ronan O'Rahilly.
From a strictly business point of view, Smith has now begun to distance himself from the fake stories spun by Ronan O'Rahilly, and he has turned to the textbooks written by the authors of entrepreneurial businesses.
Malcolm Smith has already hived-off the future repository of a pile of scrap metal called 'Ross Revenge' by dumping it onto a charity. Smith can now concentrate on building his small AM into an FM broadcasting business. What began as a fraudulent claim by Smith to turn 648 into a link with 199, has now evolved into the acquisition by Smith of an FM station as a pointer to his future endeavors.
Where Smith goes in the aftermath of the micro-world anorak squabble is not clear. He has burned his former fraudulent links to Ronan O'Rahilly. There can be no going back to that, and why would he? It belongs to the mythology of his past, not to his financial future.
Whatever Smith decides to do, O'Rahilly's grave will have no impact on his own struggle to get established in the world of mass communications. Only a hoped-for increase of deposits into Smith's personal bank account will mark Smith's future success. Right now he is still in a transition mode, and that is one of the most difficult phases for any entrepreneur to succeed in completing.
In this anorak mess Rusling has already drowned as the 'Joke-in-Chief'. No one wants him.
Therefore it is now time to now lay out the framework of our own investigation, although specific focal points will be held back until the first in a series of volumes is published. So, we encourage you to click the 'Pebble Theatre' button above and take note of what is about to be revealed on our companion Blog site.
Copyright 2022 with all rights reserved.