While the anoraks all admit that this 1990 novel by Ian Cowper Ross is a work of fiction, they cannot explain why in 1991, BBC-TV allowed Ian Cowper Ross to retell his fictitious story as though it is fact.
Nor can the brain-dead anoraks explain why Ray Clark interviewed Ian Cowper Ross as though his novel was a work of non-fiction.
Nor can they explain why a fake story about a man named "Jim Shaw", who is also addressed as "Jimmy", is then turned into the father of Ian Cowper Ross. The reason for that lie, is to create a totally fake story about the 1964 financing of 'Radio Caroline' by Ronan O'Rahilly and Stephen Christoper Moore.
That lie is based upon a person called 'Jimmy Shaw' who does not exist.
Of course it is all a pack of lies, but that did not stop Ray Clark from issuing two books containing these expanded lies, or from Ray Clark going on radio and television and telling his reinterpretation of these same lies. But then a floodgate of hack writers who were all seeking vanity publication by repeating these same lies, climbed on to this same bandwagon of lies.
Therefore we call upon Ofcom to explain why they have also endorsed these lies, and why the Charity authority in England is allowing money to be solicited from the general public by the continued promotion of these lies?
You can discuss this here (click this link).
Copyright 2022 with all rights reserved.