​Well it's time to address the subject of the other person who has engaged in misdirection, and that person is Ms. Oonagh M. Leigh who became Mrs Oonagh M. Hubbard who became Mrs Oonagh M. Karanjia.

Her version of the fictitious story of "Ronan O'Rahilly's Radio Caroline" differs in some ways from that of Ian Cowper Ross, and yet, Oonagh gives nodding acknowledgement to Ian Cowper Ross in the latest edition of Offshore Echos magazine. Of course, it is accompanied by a lot of fake information - not that her testimony is the fault of OEM editors, it is not.

We just wish that OEM had distanced themselves from Oonagh by adding that this was her version of story, and not the OEM version of the story. We add this caveat because OEM does provide some very good investigative information - which has been lifted from time-to-time without acknowledgment by several people such as Hans Knott and Paul Rusling. These two (and others), then claim OEM research as part of their own work, and then they mix it together with their own brand of misleading rubbish.

What Oonagh Leigh/Hubbard/Karanjia has done is to offer a slightly different version of the Wikipedia story surrounding the non-existent 'Jimmy Ross'. He is the phantom figure behind the fake stories about companies such as Mac Fisheries and Carphone Warehouse. But as we have already demonstrated with documentation (and we will be offering more), 'Jimmy Ross' did not exist. There is no money trail that in real life that leads to this non-existent person, because this non-existent person who was created by Ian Cowper Ross in a 1990 novel, does not exist.

But Oonagh has now come along and told us that Ian Cowper Ross met Ronan O'Rahilly and that Ian Cowper Ross then went off in search of money. She also told OEM a lot of nonsense about parking meters that conflicts with the nonsense she told Paul Russling about parking meters. This is not to say that parking meters were not installed in Marylebone, because they were, and in so reporting, OEM confirmed the Paul Rusling version of her address, which is confirmed in several other ways from hints dropped.

However, Oonagh told OEM about a marriage of Jocelyn Stevens for which we can find no proof whatsoever. But, she dropped other hints, probably by accident, that allowed us to go in search of more of the true story. Thank you Oonagh.

Now the question has been raised about the first marriage of Oonagh to a man claimed by the French press to have the surname of Huggard. But British police investigations report that the French source is unreliable, and that is confirmed by the fact that while the French newspaper acknowledged a Mr. Huggard, they should have stated that Oonagh was married to a Mr Hubbard, before marrying a Mr Karanjia. (Thank you Oonagh for posting the date of your second marriage.)

We know from police reports that Oonagh Hubbard was known previously as Oonagh Leigh and that in 1977 when she was in France, she claimed British/French nationality. The Police Report says that she was born on December 6, 1936 at Guildford in Surrey, England. We also know that as Oonagh Karanjia she began working with a London company to sell property on the Greek island of Crete.

But Oonagh either told a lot of fibs to a lot of people, or a lot of people did not know the real story and so they just filled-in the blanks with their own version of the Radio Caroline Story. In so doing they accomplished the same task as Ian Cowper Ross in his novel 'Rocking the Boat'. We think that Oonagh just lied away under the pretext that whoever she was being 'interviewed' by, just didn't have a clue.

On the other hand we know that Oonagh made stuff up as she went along! She told OEM that Michael Joseph "was the son of the big publisher Michael Joseph's." That sentence not make sense. How can somebody once be "the son of"? That person could of course have been disowned, but even then, they would remain the biological offspring of that person! However, in this instance, Oonagh is once again spouting hot air. Michael Joseph aka Michael Dean is the nephew of the famous book publisher, not his son.

But Oonagh went on to call Michael Joseph aka Michael Dean "a sort of mate. He and Ian Ross. Ian was a mate as well. Sort of Kings Road crowd." Oonagh then tried to let herself off the hook by adding: "As far as I know, I can only say my side of the story, which I think is pretty true, I was there every day. There's no reason why it would be made up."

Come on Oonagh!

You and Ian Cowper Ross both blew smoke out of your rear ends and pretended that the noise and aroma were from the traffic passing by. You both lied and lied and lied.

So what about Ian Cowper Ross?

Well Oonagh said: "When Ian was looking at the financing for Radio Caroline, he mentioned his dad and all his dad's contacts. He's called Jimmy, but I understand that his real name was something else. His nickname was Jimmy." Notice that Oonagh said that Ian was "looking at the financing for Radio Caroline". She did not say that Ian was searching for investors! During the time period that Oonagh is referring to, a wet-behind-the-ears immature Ian Cowper Ross, had just has a serious accident with a motorbike.

That was followed by Ian's reckless head-on car crash into a bus. It put Ian Cowper Ross in hospital for a year where he almost lost a foot and gained the nickname of 'Flipper'. As soon as he was released from hospital, that event put him in court where his father Charles Edward Ross was brought into the story! This is all pre-'Jimmy' nonsense and so Charlie Ross was getting fed-up with his kid. Even Ian's older step-brother was none-too-pleased when Ian started swiping parts of his biography and claiming it as his own!

Liars all!

Do the Radio Caroline 'experts' mention any of that?

No, of course not, because they don't know the real story, even though they pretend that they do!

We have been and we still are "looking at the financing for Radio Caroline", and we can tell you for a fact that this 'Jimmy' story seems to have fooled a whole string of hack writers! It just isn't true - which is why we are "looking at the financing of Radio Caroline"!

We marvel at the way Oonagh refers to the entity called 'Rosswood', while she ignors a company called R.O.R. Promotions iind of which she claimed to be a co-owner with Ronan O'Rahilly. 'Rosswood' had nothing to do with Oonagh, while R.O.R. Promotions most certainly did. So we took note of the linkage in both Rusling's 'bible' and the OEM article which tried to explain the early days of Oonagh and Ronan O'Rahilly.

Both publications failed miserably.

Ronan O'Rahilly's father was born in England, and so was Oonagh.

Ronan O'Rahilly's mother was born in the USA.

Ronan O'Rahilly was born at Dublin in the Republic of Ireland on May 21, 1940.

Oonagh was born at Guildford, Surrey on December 6, 1936

This means that Oonagh Karanjia is at least three years older than Ronan O'Rahilly.

This girl from England was uprooted from Surrey by her parents and then replanted in Kerry, Ireland, a distance of over 200 miles.

Once in Kerry, Oonagh is said by Rusling to have attended school 7 miles away in Dún Laoghaire, while Ronan O'Rahilly was just 'down road' (so to speak) from his home just outside Dublin.

There is so much inaccurate, misleading and distorted information in Rusling's 'bible', that when it is added to by Ray Clark's distorted and misleading interview of Ian Cowper Ross, and coupled with Oonagh's "two pennies worth", the actual and factual story of Radio Caroline is buried under a pile of bilge.

Wait until we tell you about Oonagh's sister!

There may be other details about the life of Oonagh Karanjia for us to uncover and include, but what we already know is that the address that Rusling claims for his bogus 'Oonagh Huggard', is the same address for Oonagh Leigh who was using it in Classified Advertising to solicit fan members for the 'Temperance Seven' pop group. One such ad appeared on Friday, June 15, 1962, and she used her own address at 36 Thayer Street, London SWI for a "friends of" society boosting the Temperance Seven, who, in 1962, decided to go professional and dropped their previous amateur connections to Oonagh. That date gives us something to work with in conjunction with the "parking meters" story, and her first connection to Ronan O'Rahilly.

What Oonagh forgot about were other 'crumbs' left in the press by her entanglements with Ronan, and they threw several spanners into the works of her own timeline which is nothing more than a fantasy story. Ian Cowper Ross called his version a novel. Oonagh's tale is not the same as the one told by Ian Cowper Ross, except that they both contradict each other and a true version of events.

Oonagh tells us in OEM that she found and leased 6 Chesterfield Gardens and then sub-let it to several other people, but she never mentions who the landlord was. But we have already told you what was going on at 8-7-6 Chesterfield Gardens, so we won't repeat that here.

We will be adding information about both 'The Scene' and 'La Discotheque' clubs, because here again, what Oonagh has told OEM is in conflict with other accounts concerning her involvement with Ronan O'Rahilly.

By the way, that story about Michael Joseph and his would-be school for actors is also untrue in the way it has been told.

Our investigation continues, and so will our revelations of the true story of Radio Caroline.

Remember, the difference between the fake version and our version is that 'they' fleece you for money as part of an ongoing fraud - while we tell you the truth - free of charge as a public service in the public interest!

​We recently received and read the latest edition of Offshore Echos Magazine (English Edition 205), and we noted a challenge in its Editorial.

It is headlined: We'll Never Know. 

Since we have successfully worked with the English Editor, we are somewhat surprised to read his statement which we accept as a challenge, and to which we reply:

We Will Know!

The reason for our confidence in disputing the OEM editorial, is because we are in the process of knowing a lot of the details that others have said either cannot be found, or cannot be verified, and we are doing it right now!

Critics base their claims upon the diminishing number of people still around who had first-hand knowledge. But that is the wrong way to investigate. People lie! Lots of people lie. Sometimes it is due to faulty memory and sometimes it is intentional.

Disc jockeys for the most part had no inside working knowledge about the money trail and without money nothing happened. We are not relying upon what a DJ said or what someone told a reporter long ago. But the main players who had contact with the money and the plans behind the Radio Caroline venture, did not live their lives in a vacuum. They left 'crumbs' behind that were documented by contemporary sources when the events were taking place, and we don't mean in just commercially reported interviews. We mean documents that were assembled by investigators for purposes of enforcing existing laws. No matter whether you agreed or disagreed with those existing laws, the investigators were "just doing their jobs" - that they were trained and paid to do. They were in search of the facts. Sometimes they were only partially successful, but that is when multiple reports by multiple investigators can be overlaid to see where documents are in agreement and where they are in conflict. Thanks to the Internet and the scanning of old documents, they are now becoming available to this investigation.

We do not mean by this that we are relying upon a single book or newsprint article, but by sources that recorded details for legal and other reasons, and sources that were not influenced by the 'actors' themselves. In other words, while individuals think that their life is private and not the business of 'outsiders', that is obviously not true, and we are not talking about snooping private eyes.

So we question the statement in the OEM that begins: "We will never know the complete story of offshore radio." While this may be true of many of the individual stations, the true and authentic primary details about the creation of Radio Caroline are now surfacing with increasing rapidity!

Yes, as OEM claims ".... there are always some missing links", but in the instance of Radio Caroline the actual story framework is now becoming clear, and it declares that EVERYTHING that has been published by others in their books and magazines to date, is a total and utter fraud - if they claim to be the true, and real story about the creation of Radio Caroline!

Therefore we totally dispute the validity of the following OEM paragraph, because as it relates to Radio Caroline and our research - it is 100% incorrect.

We will prove that this statement is totally untrue: "Some are still trying to unravel the story, but the missing links can only be filled by guesswork - it may be right - or it may be wrong. No one can say for certain."

If that statement is intended to refer to this work, well we can tell OEM that we have already found a contradiction in what they printed about Oonagh Karanjia in their recent edition 205, and what we found about Oonagh M. Leigh (same person)! In this instance, believe it or not, Paul Rusling in his plagiarized work that he calls 'The Radio Caroline Bible' is correct in part with his reporting about Oonagh Karanjia, and Offshore Echos is wrong.

On the other hand, Oonagh Karanjia may be winding everyone up just like Ian Cowper Ross - which means that we will have to expose the truth about her involvement to everyone who is trying to make sense of the Radio Caroline story.

We will continue doing just that: tomorrow!

Please visit this site for the full story behind the fake D-Day confidence trick to deceive Adolph Hitler.
​Here is an excerpt ....

While General George Patton acted out the storyline that was written for him, he was not the author of the plan.

That credit belonged to a very famous author (shown above), who worked on a highly secret committee that was part of a complex plan incorporating the activities at Bletchley, where the decoded information gained from the Nazi 'Enigma' machine, enabled the Allies to respond to the secret commands that the Germans were giving to their own military forces. This highly secret information was used in a variety of ways by Allied secret operatives. They included the SOE or Special Operations Executive, whose activities today might be classified as terrorism, and the Special Air Service known by the initials of SAS.

There was also a massive and highly secret broadcasting operation that the BBC wanted nothing to do with.

At its head was a man named Sefton Delmer and he created a huge clandestine broadcasting organization around a series of transmitters with the code name of 'Aspid'. The most powerful of these transmitters had been built in the USA for a station that never used it. After being bought from RCA, it was then shipped to England where it was nicknamed 'Astpidistra'. The name supposedly came from the Gracie Fields' recording which was actually called 'Aspidastra'. (We have previously covered that part of this story.)

Winston Churchill supervised all of these activities and most of them were, and some of still are, classified as highly secret. Churchill saw WWII as a total war to the finish, and he had set his jaw upon using any method whatsoever to defeat and destroy Nazi Germany. Some in his Cabinet became aghast and horrified by what they learned, and at least one high level person went so far as to say that he would rather lose the War than use such methods. But Churchill okayed them anyway, and their various operational directors received the go-ahead to use whatever imaginative ideas came into their heads. There was only one goal, and that was to utterly wipe-out and thus totally destroy Adolph Hitler's expansive plans to conquer and occupy other countries.

After the War the people behind all of this Allied skullduggery which originated in London, went about their civilian lives. But they were armed with a knowledge that anyone living according to the known and stated objectives of civilized life would find horrific - if those tactics were to be applied domestically in peacetime. But some found it difficult to turn off that knowledge, and at least one of them who had worked alongside the author of the fake D-Day plans of deception, became heavily involved during start-up period of Radio Caroline.

This is where the much more impressive role of General George Patton meets the life and times of Ronan O'Rahilly. It is how Patton's scriptwriter influenced the deceptive work of a very young Ian Cowper Ross who was tasked with aiding O'Rahilly into creating the fake story behind the start-up of Radio Caroline. But then Ian Cowper Ross was just a kid back in 1964, and someone else was pulling his strings!

More tomorrow ....

On page 535 of Mike Leonard's massive encyclopedia about offshore broadcasting that he published in the year 1996, there is an addendum to the big lie that first appeared in the storyline of a novel written by Ian Cowper Ross in 1990. Mike Leonard does not promote that lie, he reports what he has learned about plans for the BBC to promote that lie!

The BBC were entertaining plans for a 4-part television series about a family called 'Shaw', and the main storyteller in the novel and therefore on the screen, would be a character called 'Paul Shaw'. Who would play the part of 'Paul Shaw' we do not know - unless the BBC in 1994, were about to let Ian Cowper Ross expand upon his fake interpretation of his 1990 novel which he did on BBC-TV in a 1991 documentary, so that Ian Cowper Ross acted out the part of 'Paul Shaw'. But we don't know what would have happened because the 4-part series was never made.

In his 1990 novel, the character called 'Paul Shaw' has a father named 'Jim Shaw', who another fictitious character named 'Liam O'Mahoney' addresses as 'Jimmy'. Not 'Jimmy Shaw', just 'Jimmy', even though his fictitious son named 'Paul Shaw' says that his father's proper name is 'Jim', not 'James', just 'Jim'. But then, it is all fiction.

One year later in 1991, on BBC-TV, the same Ian Cowper Ross tells the audience that the 'Jimmy' is how Ronan O'Rahilly addressed his real father who is named Charles Edward Ross, and that the car ride described in his novel about the fictitious 'Paul Shaw', and the correspondingly fictitious meeting of 'Liam O'Mahoney' with 'Jim Shaw', is a true account of an event that did take place.

That is because, claimed Ian Cowper Ross in 1991, 'Liam O'Mahoney' is really Ronan O'Rahilly and 'Jim Shaw' who 'Liam O'Mahoney' calls 'Jimmy', is really Charles Edward Ross.

To get around the complexity of telling all that to a television audience, Ian Cowper Ross, who keeps touching his nose on the 1991 BBC-TV documenary in the way that someone who is 'only kidding' does, never made that direct link.

What Ian Cowper Ross did was to keep referring to his father Charles Edward Ross as "Daddy".

Ian Cowper Ross continues to use this approach in telling his tale to this very day. He calls his father "Daddy" and he says that Ronan O'Rahilly called his father "Jimmy", and not only that, O'Rahilly did this on his very first introductory meeting in the real home of Ian Cowper Ross.

The year was .... ?

To this day, no one has ever published a picture of Charles Edward Ross, or even specifically stated where Charles Edward Ross worked, or even named the exact date upon which this meeting took place!

Yet, according to Paul Rusling; Ray Clark, and a whole bevy of hack writers, without that first meeting between Ronan O'Rahilly and Charles Edward Ross in 1964, a station calling itself Radio Caroline would never have come on the air! So according to this fake version of events 'Jimmy Shaw' is the real "Mister Big" behind Radio Caroline - except that this fake story is simply a fake story.

It is a lie!

But if all the rest is a twisting of the truth, so is the legal and corporate structure of Radio Caroline as an entity in 1964, because in 1964 no company registered in the UK as 'Radio Caroline Limited'.

However, at the close of 1963 a ship had been bought and then equipped with American transmitters and studio equipment. So where did the money come from and how were these purchases made and who authorized them? In other words: who was the real 'Mister Big'?

Those purchases took place long before a sales company was registered in Ireland on February 25, 1964 called Planet Productions Limited.

It took quite a bit of time and some expenditure by us working with a partner, to get the Irish government to release the filed archive copies of all of the documents relating to the Planet Productions Limited company.

We have known now for some time who applied for the initial registration of Planet Productions Limited and when they did it.

We also know who took that company over, and who its directors and shareholders were.

One of its shareholders is the same person who Winston Churchill used as part of a multi-faceted secret operation to defeat Nazi Germany. His job was to assist another member of a special committee to write and promote the totally fictitious alternative plans for D-Day involving General George Patten.

​More tomorrow!

The other night a program called 9/11: Life Under Attack aired on television about the events on September 11, 2001. It presented a "narrative driven exclusively by audio and footage from the day, without any interviews".... and painted ".... a vivid portrait of events as they unfolded with new, compelling and profoundly moving accounts."

That set this program apart from others, because the commentators who often double-up to act as interpreters, were not present. The viewer and listener was transported back in time to see and hear what others saw and heard at the time. It was a very informative, enthralling, and a moving experience while at the same time being very educational.

This process of time transportation is now possible due to digitalization and the World Wide Web via WiFi Internet connections. They have made possible, a total re-immersion in subjects covering the Twentieth Century - due to the preservation and restoration of recorded sound and print as it came into extensive usage.

"Historians" are those who tell us what to see and what to hear, and how to interpret what we see and hear. But now you can see and hear the evidence from the past for yourself.

Tomorrow we will return to the theme established yesterday when we again peel back the pages of time to learn what was behind the motivation for Ian Cowper Ross to begin rewriting a history about offshore radio, and his explanation is in sharp contrast with reality. Unfortunately, the lazy approach by many causes the masses to parrot what others have told them, because they do not, and will not, research matters for themselves.

When someone does look into the past using all of the modern-day means to research archive material, what they learn is not what the "historians" have told them, but something quite different. So we invite you to see and hear what we have learned and to check out the facts for yourself. Don't take our word for it, but please, don't steal our research, or engage in the foolish game of trying to turn a typo into a factual contradiction of reality, which is what the world of the anoraks have been, and are continuing to do.

We are presenting this information free of charge on our Blogs as a public service in the public interest, but our time and our expense also makes it a work that qualifies for protection under universal copyright laws.

If we had known that we were actually trying to unmask the work of some of the very same people who deceived the Germans where the D-Day landings would take place, our underfinanced Trio would probably have never begun this 'Caroline Investigation'.

We had been given, long ago, the financial and legal files of Don Pierson who put Radio London, Radio England and Britain Radio on the air, and so we knew that he had been misled into reacting to both the British Crown and the smokescreen of deception that Ronan O'Rahilly had blown over the news media.

Therefore we are now carefully examining all of the hard and documented evidence very carefully and refraining from making new assumptions.

We are using our E+O3X code to unmask the rubbish that is out there, and we are now totally ignoring anything arising from the so-called anorak community, because we do not have the money or the time to respond to their childish rubbish.

We had hoped to arrange a cooperating symposium with others who have previously been of great help, but the anoraks on the fringe have made that impossible, especially after Paul Rusling decided to engage in outright intellectual theft of our self-funded research work. Making matters worse, because he did not understand this subject, he then took our genuine research and coupled it to his own distorted nonsense.

We will keep our readers informed of progress, but if you really want to know more about our plans to turn these Blogs into print, and add the biographical version mentioned previously, then please get in touch via the email address found under 'YesterLinks' on our companion Blog.