While the anoraks are blocking anything to do with the revelations on this site (just like the Establishment is blocking Russian media, or trying to), we know that their approach will not work. You can't hide from exposure in this multi-media age!
If you want to see RT television daily and watch its excellent documentaries that rival anything created by BBC, you can. Maybe the mainstream media tells you that you can't, but they are not telling the truth, and we know that what they are saying and writing about censorship is total rubbish, because we can see RT productions at any time we chose to do so, and we know that you are watching and reading this Blog! In fact, the closer we get to exposing the lies and deceit that the little trio of useful fools that were employed by Stevens Press Limited created back in 1964, the higher our numbers go!
Right now our numbers of viewers are climbing higher once again.
The anorak media has tried to do this before. That is when we began to tell the world how Ronan O'Rahilly had lied and deceived everyone, and then we quietened down to spend more time on building our facilities (library and conference room), while performing additional deep diving into research files. Then our numbers declined.
But, it you saw yesterday's video you will know why our viewership is climbing once more - especially since we have now revealed our ongoing publishing operation methodology and identified a stated dateline when the really big exposés will begin take take place. You don't have long to wait for that.
So far, it seems, the anoraks' media is keeping quiet about what you are learning here, but once we make a move to attract the attention of mainstream media to the true story, the real story, not the childish and repetitive stuff that has spewed out since 1991 praising the tin pot anorak god Ronan O'Rahilly, and we finally reveal why in 1964 he lied, he cheated and he defrauded in order to serve his own Master at Stevens Press Limited. As we showed you yesterday, it was Stephen Christoper Moore who gathered together Ronan O'Rahilly and Ian Cowper Ross at the behest of Stevens Press Limited.
Yet, what you still don't know because we have not revealed the story as yet, is just what the real story, the true story about the start of 'Radio Caroline' is. But we will pull back the curtains of censorship, very, very soon.
In the meantime. keep attending this Blog on a daily basis, and do tell your friends that what is about to appear here, will then cause consternation among the anoraks - once they realize that their fake game is finally up.
.... especially now that we have updated this video. We only stumbled across the answer to the biggest riddle of them all concerning the 1964 origin of 'Radio Caroline' very late last night, and so the first version of this video did not have the additional information that it now contains. To this date no one else has even claimed to have discovered this essential missing piece of the 'Radio Caroline' puzzle!
One reason for us prodding the anorak plagiarists is to give them every opportunity to hang themselves by their own lack of knowledge and their own lack of journalistic skills - combined with a vanity-stricken drive for them to rush into print and to 'tell all' (which is nothing at all), in front of a camera and microphone. Their own works tell all. They do not know the real story and instead they have fallen hook, line and sinker for the misdirection aimed at fools. This video is in a sense, our dateline stamp and it provides the dividing line between 'them' and 'us'.
We will be naming the identity of 'Mister Big' sometime during July of this year when the fourth installment of our part work is published by an extremely reputable source. If you have read the previous three installments of this work in its serialization format, then you will be interested to know that an expanded omnibus version will also be in print by the end of this year. It is intended for that book to become the first in a series of volumes that will also incorporate some of the work previously published in both non-fiction and textbook formats by our own 'Trio' members. For everyone in the anorak community, you will just have to wait because we cannot trust your 'authors' not to steal our research by plagiarizing our material and then twisting it to fit the same false narrative that is alluded to in this new video.
No, we won't tell you, but we will point out something that everyone has overlooked, and that is something that Jocelyn Stevens denied, even though no one was asking .... and what he denied was indeed true!
We mean everything except the bits about location and greasy slaves.
There are two basic questions that anoraks and people like Ray Clark cannot answer, and both of these questions provide part of the answers to two more questions: who created 'Radio Caroline' in 1964, and why did they they do it?
We know a lot about the true answers, and we also know a lot about the three key individuals who were used to mislead everyone away from searching for the true answers.
One person is Stephen Christopher Moore.
He arrived at Southampton in 1948 and over the following years he got to know Ronan O'Rahilly. Stephen called himself 'Chris Moore' when he was a disc jockey for a property owner who managed more than one venue with an eponymous name that was affiliated with Stephen Moore's place of work.
Stephen Moore also met Ian Cowper Ross who he introduced to Ronan O'Rahilly.
This gang of three were indirectly hired by Jocelyn Stephens who was the public link in a chain of publicity vendors. A lot of it was false publicity. Some of the elements in that chain came together by chance rather than design.
This includes a young venture seeker and publicity hound named Robin Leach who attended school at Harrow. It was Robin Leach, for his own ends and purposes, who dreamed up the 'Caroline Kennedy Hoax', but its telling was first handed-off to Stephen Moore, while Ronan O'Rahilly was used as an alternative voice to offer a totally fictitious explanation as to where the name 'Caroline' had come from.
Ronan O'Rahilly also made a lot of false claims about Georgie Fame who made it clear that the kind of music he wanted to play was not commercial, and even though he already had an EMI recording contract, his career was going nowhere. Just after 'Radio Caroline' came on the air, Georgie Fame was ready to emigrate to the USA. Ronan O'Rahilly's lies about Georgie Fame are many, but the fact is that Ronan O'Rahilly was a liar who mislead everyone who was silly enough to listen to him.
It was Beatrix Miller, the editor of 'Queen' who began to use and promote the name 'Caroline', but when Jocelyn Stevens bought the company that published 'Queen', she quit. But Jocelyn Stevens managed to hire her back. For a time everything went according to plan, but then Jocelyn Stevens was brought into the Pye Plan to create 'Radio Caroline', except that the directors of Pye knew nothing about the plan.
However, Stevens had not just bought one publication named 'Queen', he bought several other publications as well, and then he got the idea to turn the quiet and sedate 'Caroline', into a slut. Since 'Caroline' was named after a real person that Beatrix Miller knew, Beatrix Miller quit for a second time, and this time on the same day that Planet Productions was registered in Ireland as a sales outfit. The ship had already been bought, along with the equipment and a number of former BBC engineers became part of a plan to set up a broadcasting station on a ship. One of those engineers had ties back to the early days of the BBC at Savoy Hill, and his expertise was in studio equipment. A. N. Thomas was another technician, and he supervised the 'Caroline' transmitters.
Ironically the grandfather of the real 'Caroline' had talked about doing something similar aboard a ship back in the Nineteen Thirties, but at that time the technology did not make it feasible. Through this man the real story of 'Caroline' comes into play along with the connecting dots that lead to Jocelyn Stevens.
There are a lot, and we do mean a lot of unrelated strands in this very complicated story that only came together as part of an omnibus plan just before the commencement of broadcasting in 1964 by 'Radio Caroline'. Yet, the mythology of 'Caroline Kennedy' only comes into play in 1965, and no one asks why?
The same thing is true with a person called 'Jimmy Ross' who is mentioned by a newspaper without explanation, until 1990 when Ian Cowper Ross invented fantasy drive to Hindhead by Stephen Moore, Ronan O'Rahilly and Ian Cowper Ross. He did that by inference when he subtlety inked the text of his 1990 novel about a family named Shaw, by retrospectively connecting the dots back in time to the year 1964, and his opportunity came first on BBC-TV, and then with an interview by Ray Clark.
So come on Ray Clark: Step up and admit that you have no source for this fantasy car ride other than the suggestions made to you by Ian Cowper Ross. He was one of three very young and very immature guys who were picked-up by Jocelyn Stevens.
The real father of Ian Cowper Ross was a genuine salesman selling dry-cleaning franchises, and even Ian has painted himself as a useless kid who his real father was sick of financially supporting, since he had got to the useless stage of wrecking an expensive motorcycle and then a sports car. This landed him first in hospital and then in court. It was Jocelyn who gave this kid something to do as part of the team whose job it was to lie to everyone and anyone who would listen to them, and this included the press.
Apparently it still includes Ray Clark and Chris Edwards of OEM.
Perception is reality if you do not know what reality is, and clearly the anoraks do not because their Masters who are feeding the media they are reading, listening to and watching, will not tell them. If OEM told the truth, it would now go out of business, because it would reveal that its text is but a lie, and the spins that it puts on reproduced news cuttings (often without source and date) are accompanied by pictures that require textual captions that can only be interpreted by the misinformation in its body of text. Sometimes that misinformation is by omission and sometimes it is by commission - such as its foundational lies about Ronan O'Rahilly.
That misinformation is contained within the falsehoods that are propping-up Malcolm Smith, who is also aided by a string of post-1991 publishers that include, Ray Clark and Smith's lapdog Rusling. Ray Clark is the one who really holds the key to bringing down Malcolm Smith, if and when Ray Clark steps forward to say that he was conned by Ian Cowper Ross.
The Ian Cowper Ross nonsense began in 1990, and expanded from print to TV in 1991, and then, Ray Clark interviewed Ian Cowper Ross who applied a coating of gloss over his lies. But without the lies of Ian Cowper Ross, the entire structure of Malcolm Smith's "Caroline continues" falsehood is ripped apart. So is the deception published by OEM.
However, Chris Edwards knows part of the true foundational story that undermines Ray Clark's words, and so Chris Edwards could, if he wanted to, bring down the entire 'Caroline' fraud. What Ray Clark knows is known only to Ray Clark since we have never worked with him. We have worked with Chris Edwards.
But we dare not reveal here what we now know post-OEM and Chris Edwards due to the activities of thieves such as Paul Rusling. What we can do here is to poke and prod anoraks to respond with statements about what they do not know about the truth, and it is these statements that can and will be used against them.
Chris Edwards KNOWS what we discovered regarding page 276. Chris Edwards knows that Ronan O'Rahilly was a fraud. How much longer is Chris Edwards going to hold out covering-up the real story? Or is Chris Edwards going down with the rusting remains of a hulk called 'Ross Revenge'? Your call Chris. Stand with the idiot anoraks, or tell the idiot anoraks the truth - as you now know it. We know that you have not been told about our findings since page 276, but you know enough of the exposed true story to present you with a dilemma: Do you now tell the truth, or do you continue to sell the lie? Your call.
On June 16, 2022, Malcolm Smith claimed that "while the public are largely aware that there was 'something' called Caroline .... this is in the past tense not present tense. As a brand, the name still has great value ...."
How is that again?
Smith: The public are aware that "something called Caroline" once existed in the past.
Smith: The public place great "brand value" on "something called Caroline" that once existed in the past.
On June 16, 2022, Malcolm Smith, falsely calling himself "Peter Moore", wrote and posted this on the Dave Martin forum ....
"Most of you will know that the 1967 MOA made any promotion of Radio Caroline illegal along with all the other activities where penalties and imprisonment would happen. The daily programme schedules that were in the national dailies at once disappeared. My father worked for the Sunday Times and I naively asked him if Caroline could not still be a news story. He returned to tell me that his editor stated that he would only report on Caroline if it sank. .... So while the public are largely aware that there was 'something' called Caroline .... this is in the past tense not present tense. As a brand, the name still has great value which is why people have vigorously tried to take and use the title at various times."
But is Malcolm Smith's statement about 'brand value', a true statement?
No, it's not, and even Malcolm Smith does not believe that it is!
Malcolm Smith claims that "as a brand, the name still has great value", but Malcolm Smith does not believe this to be a true statement of fact!
Here is what Malcom Smith says about his tin pot licenced station which he calls 'Radio Caroline' and its primary Internet streaming service: "We peak at 2500 not counting AM and DAB that we cannot survey. Someone will surely say ' but it's not ten million is it '. No, it is not."
The fact is that Malcolm Smith admits that the general public is not listening to his own personal venture that is totally unrelated to the 1964-1967 'Radio Caroline'. His venture has, in terms of actual listeners, no real audience at all.
Malcolm Smith has no audience worthy of being considered a player in the mass market medium called radio broadcasting, whether it is by Internet streaming, AM, DAB or anything else. This is the reason for his obstructionist lies that interfere with the true story of the 1964-1967 'Radio Caroline' being told. Malcolm Smith has to lie using the fake storylines spun by everyone from Ray Clark to Paul Rusling, in order to deceive the media into giving him free coverage of any sort.
Malcolm Smith is using every method possible to deceive the public through false information, whether it is over the Internet, filings with Companies House, or the Charity authority in England. Malcolm Smith has to wrap his arms around something that did exist and which at one time in the distant past did cause major repercussions in British radio back in 1964, if only to bring about the arrival of the Texas-based 'Radio London' which became the model adopted in part by the BBC for its new 'Radio One'.
Malcolm Smith continues to promote more than a myth: Malcolm Smith is promoting a lie which is interfering with public education. That is Malcolm Smith's Number One achievement to date!
Ray Clark produced two editions of this book. Why didn't his second version correct his first version, and why has he helped Ian Cowper Ross to promote the lies broadcast by BBC-TV in 1991 which are founded upon a linked chain of lies that began with Stephen Christopher Moore and ended with Ronan O'Rahilly?
We tried to work with anoraks to uncover the true story; the real past account of events. But each time we inched further by unmasking the lies spread by people like Ronan O'Rahilly and his henchmen such as Stephen Christopher Moore and Ian Cowper Ross, the anoraks in question got frightened. Their world of falsehood and make-believe was about to be exposed as a fraud; as a fake, as part of a yesterday that never happened.
Instead of wanting to further a symposium where everyone who has an interest in a true account of the cultural development of modern communications and the accompanying laws surrounding that cultural development, vested interests moved to bribe the anoraks into attacking the messenger, since they could not attack the message. Those who went along with the bribes were awarded licenses, and those who did not were attacked in order to shut them up.
It has taken us decades fighting against rogue historians and politicians of the Establishment, as well as their sneering lap-dog anoraks who were all waiting for their bribes. It has taken decades to get to the point that we are now nearing: the exposure of a totally different timeline with a totally different series of key players, along with the debunking of the con men and their media clowns who do not want the true story to be told.
Why does the Establishment want the lid to be kept on this story? The answer is money, and that money buys the political power to silence the true story.
But that story is being told, and it has been told bit by bit as the true story has become revealed.
Soon, very soon (this year), the first unveiling of the framework of that true story will take place. It is all being done very carefully so that the howling critics can be silenced by footnotes, endnotes and third-party reference documentation. Of course those yelling and screaming probably won't notice, because they will be too busy yelling and screaming at the messenger, and so they won't hear or read the message.
What will happen then is that those "convinced against their will, will be of the same opinion still." We know that.
However, when the curtain is pulled back it will be accomplished in such a way as to open up discussion, not silence it. As much as Prince Charles may have been born into an Establishment which he has not shunned, he too will have to address those facts that will appear in evidence, because modern means of communications in the hands of individuals can no longer be silenced by centralized censors.
So if you are wondering what is taking us so long, ask your friends, the paid-off, ignorant, and cultish anoraks publishers and broadcasters of the anorak lies. Ask them when they will ever accept the fact that Ronan O'Rahilly was a liar, and ask them when they will admit that everything that Ronan O'Rahilly claimed in the name of 'free radio' was, and is, a lie.