LATEST UPDATE FEBRUARY 14, 2026
NEWSFLASH! As Kaylee Rose tells us in her latest song that "from out of the blue, everything comes back", we were absolutely floored to read a new Wikipedia page about 'The Crown' with a link to a 1901 judicial paper that "we" could have written (in one sense), if we had been alive back then.
This paper explains in-depth the difference between the 'crown' as a hat, and 'The Crown' as a corporation sole. What is more astounding is the fact that this "Will-O'-The-Wisp" is like its namesake, "these lights are traditionally thought to mislead", because in legal jargon, it becomes difficult to define: it is something and it is nothing. But, in the real world it is everything!
In other words, the very foundation upon which the fraudsters turn to when boosting the United Kingdom's claim to soveriegnty, is indeed, only make-believe. Shades of Conway Twitty there.
We have often suggested a question for a pub night quiz should be "Which nation is the oldest: the USA or the UK?" The answer being, the USA in 1789 (when it was 'born again' as a federal republic with its current written constitution.) The UK seems to go back to the year 1924 when the words 'Northern Ireland' appeared.
But the entire premise upon which British broadcasting rests, is that same 'Will-O'-The-Wisp' year of 1660 when The Crown as a corporation sole reappeared on the pages of British jurisprudence. It was manifested by its new representive King (Charles II). Now we have a King Charles III flapping around in his ridiculous garb.
It's time to get real and read what was written back in 1901, which happens to be what we have been saying along along about the claimed 'past': yesterday never happened.
This paper explains in-depth the difference between the 'crown' as a hat, and 'The Crown' as a corporation sole. What is more astounding is the fact that this "Will-O'-The-Wisp" is like its namesake, "these lights are traditionally thought to mislead", because in legal jargon, it becomes difficult to define: it is something and it is nothing. But, in the real world it is everything!
In other words, the very foundation upon which the fraudsters turn to when boosting the United Kingdom's claim to soveriegnty, is indeed, only make-believe. Shades of Conway Twitty there.
We have often suggested a question for a pub night quiz should be "Which nation is the oldest: the USA or the UK?" The answer being, the USA in 1789 (when it was 'born again' as a federal republic with its current written constitution.) The UK seems to go back to the year 1924 when the words 'Northern Ireland' appeared.
But the entire premise upon which British broadcasting rests, is that same 'Will-O'-The-Wisp' year of 1660 when The Crown as a corporation sole reappeared on the pages of British jurisprudence. It was manifested by its new representive King (Charles II). Now we have a King Charles III flapping around in his ridiculous garb.
It's time to get real and read what was written back in 1901, which happens to be what we have been saying along along about the claimed 'past': yesterday never happened.
NEWSFLASH! We have discovered the exact methodolgy by which the management of Radio Caroline (created by Pye in secret on March 27, 1964), was transferred to New York City after October 15, 1964, and the part played by Ronan O'Rahilly as a stooge, or 'front man'. His job was to mislead the media by concealing actual events, and the real means of managing Radio Caroline. It involved deceiving U.S. Senator Robert F. Kennedy into believing a fake story about his neice, 6 years-old Caroline Kennedy. For a time during 1965, it put Radio Caroline under the control of Morris Levy and the NY Jewish/Italian Mafia, represented in the United Kingdom by the Kray Twins. When Ronan O'Rahillly first arrived in London during 1961, he claimed to be an anti-law anarchist. He began working as a 'bagman' for Peter Rachman, his partner Raymond Nash, the Kray Twins, and the UK criminal underworld. More details to follow.
Click here to read about the contextual background to our work in Constitutional Genealogy and Historical Pedigreeism.
Click here to read about the contextual background to our work in Constitutional Genealogy and Historical Pedigreeism.
